Abstract
Background Numerous clinical trials have considered the potential linkages between statins and cancer. Despite some evidence for reduced mortality associated with statin use, the results thus far have been somewhat inconclusive and not easily comparable, thus hampering the emergence of a consensus. We suspect that this uncertainty would be reduced, and greater clarity achieved (e.g. regarding clinical best practices and standards-of-care), were we to have a reliable, causal biomarker that could help identify those individual patients who might benefit from statin use during cancer treatment.
Methods and Findings In the joint experimental and statistical analysis reported here, we assessed the inhibitory potential of various statins on the expression of a tumor enhancer known as MACC1, taking into account the molecular functions of this key metastasis-associated protein. To assess any effects of statins in cancer prevention (observationally), we also performed a retrospective, two-center, nested case-control study, focusing on medical centers in Berlin, Germany and Virginia, USA. Among nearly a half-million patient visits, over a decade-long period, cancer patients were identified and analyzed in comparison to patients without cancer diagnoses. Odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) for cancer were computed for patients with and without statin intake, accounting for potential confounders. Finally, we also extended these analyses of our trans-Atlantic cohort by utilizing real-world data from 132,072 cancer patients with statins available on the TriNetX platform.
Experimental work revealed that statins inhibit MACC1 mRNA levels and protein expression, resulting in reduced MACC1-induced phenotypic functions, such as motility and proliferation. Moreover, we found that statins restrict colorectal cancer (CRC) growth and metastasis in xenografted mice. The cohort data that we gathered at the German and U.S. centers enabled analysis of 53,113 cancer patients and matched controls. These were extracted, aggregated, and 1:1 matched (by age/gender) in order to build propensity-score matched sub-cohorts, to mitigate confounder bias. Based on this real-world evidence (RWE), we found that atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin and simvastatin were associated with a 50% reduced overall risk for developing cancer (OR 0.5, CI 0.48-0.51). The strongest association of reduced cancer risk was found for (i) liver cancer (OR 0.35, 0.29-0.43), (ii) secondary neoplasms of respiratory and digestive organs (OR 0.42, 0.34-0.45), and (iii) colorectal cancer (OR 0.44, 0.39-0.5). The effect of atorvastatin (OR 0.3, 0.28-0.32) exceeded other considered statins, even after exclusion of aspirin as the strongest confounder (OR 0.63, CI 0.57-0.7). Additionally, we note that those patients taking statins have a 38% decreased risk of death (HR 0.64, 0.48-0.86).
Conclusions Our data, which offer evidence for cancer-preventative and anti-metastatic effects of statins, lead us to suggest that these medications should be considered in treating some types of cancers. In addition, MACC1 may serve as a potentially helpful biomarker for purposes of patient stratification (and personalized treatment). A more definitive test of these proposed ideas could come from prospective, randomized clinical trials.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by TRR295, KFO339, and DFG PR1562/1-1 (RP). Portions of this work were also supported by the University of Virginia School of Data Science and by NSF CAREER award MCB-1350957. This work was also in part supported by the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and SPARK-BIH Berlin.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We retrieved data from the COVID-19 Research Network supplied by TriNetX, comprising ~400M patients from 130 health care organizations in 30 countries. TriNetX provides a global federated health research network providing access to electronic medical records (diagnoses, procedures, medications, laboratory values, genomic information), and the TriNetX platform uses only aggregated counts and statistical summaries of de-identified information; no protected health information (PHI) or personal data is made available on the platform. We were advised by the University of Virginia's IRB that this project did not meet the criteria for Human Subject Research; therefore, no additional IRB submission/review was deemed necessary (by the IRB) to proceed with this project. The animal (mice) experiments were conducted in compliance with the United Kingdom's Coordinating Committee of Cancer Research (UKCCCR) guidelines, and approval was granted by the State Office of Health and Social Affairs (Landesamt fur Gesundheit und Soziales, LaGeSo, Berlin, Germany) under the permit Reg0010/19.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding This work was supported by TRR295, KFO339, and DFG PR1562/1-1 (RP). Portions of this work were also supported by the University of Virginia School of Data Science and by NSF CAREER award MCB-1350957. This work was also in part supported by the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and SPARK-BIH Berlin.
Data Availability
All data referred to in the manuscript is available either as supplementary materials or by request from the study's corresponding authors.