Abstract
How did people change their behavior over the different phases of the UK COVID-19 restrictions, and how did these changes affect their risk of being exposed to infection? Time use diary surveys are unique in providing a complete chronicle of daily behavior; 24-hour continuous records of the populations’ activities, their social context and their location. We present results from four such surveys, collected in real time from representative UK samples, both before, and at three points over the course of the current pandemic. Comparing across the four waves, we find evidence of substantial changes in the UK population’s behavior relating to activities, locations and social context. We assign different levels of risk to combinations of activities, locations and copresence, to compare risk-related behavior across successive ‘lockdowns’. We find evidence that during the second lockdown (November 2020) there was an increase in high-risk behaviors relative to the first (starting March 2020). This increase is shown to be associated with more paid work time in the workplace. At a time when capacity is still limited both in respect of immunization and track-trace technology, governments must continue to rely on changes in people’s daily behaviors to contain the spread of COVID-19 and similar viruses. Time use diary information of this type, collected in real time across the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, can provide policy-makers with information to assess and quantify changes in daily behaviors, and the impact they are likely to have on overall behavioral-associated risks.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the ESRC (ES/S010149/1)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IOE ethics committee, UCL
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Analyses re-run following modification of data weighting; Results and discussion section changed to reflect this (time spent in high risk activity in Nov 2020 lockdown is still statistically significantly higher than in May 2020 across both genders and all except the oldest age group, but only in relation to paid work in the workplace); Updated risk classification following epidemiological literature emphasis on ventilation.
Data Availability
The data is available from the UK Data Service archive
https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/studies/study?id=8741