Abstract
Introduction The United Kingdom's (UK) National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) needs access to evidence on COVID-19 to develop rapid guidelines for healthcare professionals. This paper reports on how the NICE COVID-19 search strategy for identifying references in Ovid MEDLINE and Embase has been developed and maintained. Methods Each free-text line from the June 2020 version of the NICE COVID-19 search strategy was categorised as Critical, High, Medium, Low or Zero priority, according to the number of results and their relevance to NICE. Five search options were devised and tested by combining them with a search for drug treatments. The two prioritised options were compared to the COVID-19 Limit available in Ovid. New subject headings were tested and added. The selected option was refined to make the strategy simpler to use. Results The updated strategy combines free-text terms, categorised as Critical, High and Medium priority for NICE, with appropriate subject headings. Discussion The paper describes the challenges of maintaining a search strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic, as terminology continues to evolve. Conclusions A search strategy for identifying COVID-19 references, within the remit of NICE, has been developed. The recommended strategy could be considered for validation at an appropriate point in the pandemic. It is hoped that understanding how NICE has maintained its COVID-19 strategy will encourage further discussion on the challenges.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was conducted as part of the authors' employment at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and no additional funding was received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This paper does not include patient data and does not require IRB or ethics committee approval.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Full search strategies are available in the supplementary files. Please contact the authors for any further data required.
