ABSTRACT
Objectives The study aimed to assess the determinants of modern contraceptive method use among young women in Benin.
Design A mixed-methods design.
Setting and participants We used the Benin 2017-18 Demographic and Health Survey datasets for quantitative analysis. Data collection was conducted using multiple-cluster sampling method and through household survey. Qualitative part was conducted in the city of Allada, one of the Fon cultural capitals. The participants were purposively selected.
Outcomes Contraceptive prevalence rate, unmet need for modern method, and percentage of demand satisfied by a modern method for currently married and sexually active unmarried women were measured in the quantitative part. Access barriers and utilization of modern methods were assessed in the qualitative part.
Results Overall, 8.5% (95%CI: 7.7-9.5%) among young women ages 15 to 24 were using modern contraceptives and 13% (95%CI: 12.1-14.0%) among women ages 25 or more. Women 15-24 had a higher unmet need, and a lower demand satisfied by modern contraceptive methods compared to women aged 25 or more. 60.8% (56.9-64.7%) of all unmarried young women had unmet need for modern contraceptives. Young women were more likely to use male condoms which they obtain mainly from for-profit outlets, pharmacies, and relatives. The factors associated with demand satisfied by a modern method were literacy, being unmarried, knowing a greater number of modern contraceptive methods, and experiencing barriers in access to health services. On the other hand, the qualitative study found that barriers to using modern methods include community norms about pre-marital sexual intercourse, perceptions about young women’s fertility, spousal consent, and the use of non-modern contraceptives.
Conclusion Contraceptive use is low among young women in Benin. The use of modern contraceptives is influenced by socio-demographic factors and social norms. Appropriate interventions might promote comprehensive sexuality education, increase community engagement, provide youth-friendly services, and address gender inequalities.
Strengths and limitations of this study
This study used a nationally representative survey data which allows generalizability at the national level.
We used a mixed methods design which enables us to compare and discuss the large-scale quantitative data with qualitative information from the ground.
The quantitative information could have been affected by recall errors and biases.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by core funding from Nagasaki University School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health to MM (grant number N/A).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research of the University of Parakou in Benin (approval number: 0092/CLERB-UP/P/SP/R/SA); Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp in Belgium (approval number: IRB/AB/AC/044); Nagasaki University School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health in Japan (approval number: NU-TMGH_064)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Quantitative data is available from the DHS program. Qualitative data is available from the authors upon request.
