Abstract
Neurobiological pain models propose that the transition from acute to chronic pain is accompanied by neuropathological adaptations that mediate progressive pain processing dysfunctions. In contrast, meta-analytic studies on neurofunctional dysregulations in chronic pain have not revealed convergent evidence for robust alterations during experimental pain induction. Against this background, the present neuroimaging meta-analysis combined three different meta-analytic approaches with stringent study selection criteria for case-control functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments during acute pain processing with a focus on chronic pain disorders (i.e., fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic low back pain, neuropathic pain; n = 295 patients, n = 211 controls; 86 foci). Across the meta-analytic approaches, convergent neurofunctional dysregulations in chronic pain patients were observed in the left anterior insula cortex, with study characteristics indicating generalized pain processing abnormalities. Seed-based resting-state functional connectivity based on a large publicly available dataset combined with a meta-analytic task-based approach identified the anterior insular region as a key node of an extended bilateral insula-fronto-cingular network, resembling the salience network. Moreover, the meta-analytic decoding showed that this region presents a high probability to be specifically activated during pain-related processes. Together, the present findings indicate that dysregulated left anterior insular activity represents a robust neurofunctional maladaptation and potential treatment target in chronic pain disorders.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
This paper is a meta-analysis
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFA0701400), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC31700998)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a meta-analysis that does not need IRB approval.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Original data will be available upon request.