Abstract
Vaccines remain the cornerstone for containing the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. mRNA vaccines provide protection in clinical trials using a two-dose approach, separated by a three-week gap. Here we assessed real world immune responses following vaccination with mRNA-based vaccine BNT162b2. Following the first and second doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine, we measured IFNγ T cell responses, both total IgG Spike/ IgG Spike RBD and neutralising antibody responses to Spike in sera using a lentiviral pseudotyping system. Median age was 82 amongst 26 participants. Three weeks after the first dose a lower proportion of participants over 80 years old achieved adequate neutralisation titre of >1:4 for 50% neutralisation as compared to those under 80 (8/15 versus 11/11, p<0.05). Mean neutralisation titres in this age group after the first dose were lower than in younger individuals (p<0.05). Following the second dose, neutralising antibody response 50% titres were above 1:4 in all individuals and there was no longer a difference by age grouping. A significant proportion of individuals over 80 appear to require a second dose of vaccine, given in this study at three weeks, to achieve virus neutralisation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
NIHR Bioresource
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the East of England Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee (17EE0025).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are available on request from the corresponding author