ABBSTRACT
DYRK1A-related intellectual disability (ID) is among the most frequent monogenic form of ID. We refined the description of this disorder by reporting clinical and molecular data of forty individuals with ID harboring DYRK1A variants. We developed a combination of tools to interpret missense variants, which remains a major challenge in human genetics: i) a specific DYRK1A clinical score, ii) amino acid conservation data generated from one hundred of DYRK1A sequences across different taxa, iii) in vitro overexpression assays to study level, cellular localization, and kinase activity of DYRK1A mutant proteins, and iv) a specific blood DNA methylation signature. This integrative approach was successful to reclassify several variants as pathogenic. However, we questioned the involvement of some others, such as p.Thr588Asn, yet reported as pathogenic, and showed it does not cause obvious phenotype in mice, emphasizing the need to take care when interpreting variants, even those occurring de novo.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors also thank the Agence de Biomedecine and Fondation APLM for their financial support.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Affected individuals were referred by clinical genetic services and a genetic testing was done as part of routine clinical care. All patients enrolled and/or their legal representative have signed informed consent for research use and authorization for publication. All the institutions received local IRB approval to use these data in research purpose. The main IRB approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Strasbourg University Hospital (CCPPRB).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Competing interests: None.
Data Availability
the variants have been sumbitted to clinvar. All data are available upon request
