Abstract
Background There is no cure for asthma and as such, prevention remains a major goal. Given budget constraints, the value-for-money proposition of any asthma prevention strategy should be rigorously investigated before its widespread adoption, a task that is often performed through the use of decision-analytic models. The objective of this study was to solicit expert opinion to develop a concept map for a primary prevention policy model for asthma.
Methods We reviewed currently available decision-analytic models for asthma prevention. A steering committee of economic modelers, allergists and respirologists was then convened to draft a conceptual model of pediatric asthma. A modified Delphi method was followed to refine the conceptual model and achieve consensus among panel experts.
Results In the final conceptual model, asthma diagnosis was based upon lung function, atopy, and their symptoms, which in turn were affected by patient characteristics (sex, birth mode, ethnicity, lung growth, anthropometrics, rate of weight gain, genetics, and microbiome), family history, and environmental factors (breastfeeding, family/day-care size, pets, season, built environment, socio-economic status, diet, infection, and exposures).
Conclusions The conceptual model can inform the development and validation of a policy model for childhood asthma prevention.
Funding Genome Canada Large-Scale Applied Research Project
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Genome Canada Large-Scale Applied Research Project
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of British Columbia Human Ethics Board (H17-00938).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Contribution Statement: MS, SET, and PS conceived the study. MS, SET, PS, and AA drafted the initial concept map as the steering committee. SET, PS, MRS, ABB, PJM, and TM were the members of the Delphi panel and provided structured feedback in two rounds of surveys and the consensus meeting. AA and MS designed the survey. AA analyzed the data, conducted the systematic review, and drafted the manuscript. TYL contributed to the systematic review. All authors revised the manuscript critically and approved the final version to be published.
Data Availability
All survey data is available upon request.
