Abstract
Background Nipah virus (NiV) is an emerging, bat-borne pathogen that can be transmitted from person-to-person. Vaccines are currently being developed for NiV, and studies funded to evaluate their safety and immunogenicity, so that they could possibly be used to contain outbreaks. An important unanswered question is whether it will be possible to evaluate the efficacy of vaccine candidates in phase III clinical trials in a context where spillovers from the zoonotic reservoir are infrequent and associated with small outbreaks. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of conducting a phase III vaccine trial in Bangladesh, the only country reporting regularly NiV cases.
Methods We used simulations based on previously observed NiV cases from Bangladesh, an assumed vaccine efficacy of 90% and other NiV vaccine target characteristics, to compare three vaccination study designs: (i) cluster randomized ring vaccination, (ii) cluster randomized mass vaccination, and (iii) an observational case-control study design.
Results The simulations showed that, assuming a ramp-up period of 10 days and a mean hospitalization delay of 4 days, it would take 516 years and over 163,000 vaccine doses to run a ring vaccination trial under current epidemic conditions. A cluster-randomized trial in the two most affected districts would take 81 years and 2.3 million vaccine doses. An observational case-control design in these two districts would require seven years and 2.5 million vaccine doses.
Discussion Without a change in the epidemiology of NiV, ring vaccination or cluster-randomized trials are unlikely to be completed within a reasonable time window. In this light, the remaining options are: (i) not conducting a phase III trial until the epidemiology of NiV changes, (ii) identifying alternative ways to licensure such as observational studies or controlled studies in animals such as in the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Animal Rule.
Competing Interest Statement
ML has received grants from Pfizer, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Bristol-Meyers Squibb, personal fees from Sanofi Pasteur, unrelated to the present work.
Funding Statement
B. N. and S. C. acknowledge the support of the Laboratory of Excellence Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases (Grant ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID), the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Models of Infectious Disease Agent Study Initiative, the AXA Research Fund and the INCEPTION project (PIA/ANR-16-CONV-0005).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a simulation study- no IRB was necessary.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* co-last authors
Data Availability
Not applicable
