Abstract
Introduction The three different breast cancer subtypes (Luminal, HER2-positive and triple negative (TNBCs) display different natural history and sensitivity to treatment, but little is known about whether residual axillary disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) carries a different prognostic value by BC subtype.
Methods We retrospectively evaluated axillary involvement (0, 1 to 3 positive nodes, ≥ 4 positive nodes) on surgical specimens from a cohort of T1-T3NxM0 BC patients treated with NAC between 2002 and 2012. We analyzed the association between nodal involvement (ypN) binned into 3 classes (0; [1-3];4 or more), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) among the global population, and according to BC subtypes.
Results 1197 patients were included in the analysis (luminal (n = 526, 43.9%), TNBCs (n = 376, 31.4%), HER2-positive BCs (n = 295, 24.6%)). After a median follow-up of 110.5 months, ypN was significantly associated with RFS, but this effect was different by BC subtype (Pinteraction= 0.004), and this effect was nonlinear. In the luminal subgroup, RFS was impaired in patients with 4 or more nodes involved (HR=2.8; 95% CI [1.93;4.06], p<0.001) when compared with ypN0, while it was not in patients with 1 to 3 nodes (HR=1.24, 95% CI = [0,86;1.79]). In patients with TNBC, both 1-3N+ and ≥ 4 N+ classes were associated with a decreased RFS (HR=3.19, 95%CI= [2.05; 4.98] and HR=4.83, 95%CI= [3.06; 7.63], respectively versus ypN0, p< 0.001). Similar decreased prognosis were observed among patients with HER2-positive BC (1-3N+: HR=2.7, 95%CI= [1.64; 4.43] and ≥ 4 N+: HR=2.69, 95%CI= [1.24; 5.8] respectively, p=0.003).
Conclusion The prognostic value of residual axillary disease should be considered differently in the 3 BC subtypes to accurately stratify patients with a high risk of recurrence after NAC who should be offered second line therapies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
Informed consent from patients was not required by French regulations
Funding Statement
We thank Roche France for financial support for the construction of the Institut Curie neoadjuvant database (NEOREP).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Informed consent from patients was not required by French regulations
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data are available