Abstract
Effective responses to the COVID-19 pandemic require reliable estimates of actual cases and deaths, and models that incorporate behavioral factors including differential priorities for allocating limited testing capacity, heterogeneous risk perceptions and resulting contact reductions, improved treatment, and adherence fatigue. We develop a behavioral dynamic model integrating these factors with asymptomatic transmission, disease acuity, and hospital capacity. Using a hierarchical Bayesian framework we estimate the model parameters with a panel dataset spanning all 91 nations with reliable testing data. Cumulative cases and deaths through 30 October 2020 are estimated to be 8.5 and 1.4 times greater than official reports, yielding an overall infection fatality rate (IFR) of 0.48%, with wide variation across nations and significant decline in IFR over time. Adherence fatigue is estimated to have increased cumulative cases by 61% through October 2020. Scenarios through March 2021 show modest policy interventions and behavior change could reduce cumulative cases ≈18%. The model endogenously generates the multiple waves of infection and mortality observed in many nations as behavioral responses to perceived risk cause the reproduction number to fluctuate around 1, but with death rates that vary by two orders of magnitude depending on responsiveness to perceived risks.
One Sentence Summary COVID-19 under-reporting is large, varies widely across nations, and strongly conditions projected outbreak dynamics.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding was used to conduct this study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Not applicable
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
- Updated with data until October 30, 2020 - Added 5 countries to the estimates - Incorporated impact of adherence fatigue - Incorporated the impact of learning on fatality reduction - Enhanced out of sample prediction test - Added comparison with seriological data - Edited the manuscript extensively
↵1 In the equations below we use short-hands to simplify mathematical notations. The full model documentation uses full variable names. Table S1 provides the mapping between the short-hands and the full names, as well as the sources and equations for those variables and parameters discussed below.
↵2 https://blog.ons.gov.uk/2020/03/31/counting-deaths-involving-the-coronavirus-covid-19/
↵3 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/previous-testing-in-us.html
↵4 See e.g. https://www.wcvb.com/article/massachusetts-coronavirus-reporting-delay-due-to-quest-lab-it-glitch/32288903#
↵5 It may be argued that there are weekly cycles in large-scale human behaviour that may drive some true weekly cyclicality in the true rates of infection and death, and as such it may be wrong to consider such cycles to be artefacts of the data- generation process. However, we find this unlikely for a few reasons. First, weekly cycles in human interactions, largely driven by the work and school week and weekend, will have been significantly attenuated by widespread adoption of social distancing measures around the world. Second and more importantly, variation in incubation period and time before development of symptoms means that any true cyclicality in the timing of initial infection will be further attenuated in the timing of symptom development. By the same logic, wide variability in the delay from symptom development to death means there should be minimal cyclicality, if any, in the timing of deaths, meaning any such cycles visible in the data are due to measurement and reporting lags.
↵6 https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.interpolate.PchipInterpolator.html
↵7 Cleveland R.B., Cleveland W.S., McRae J.E., Terpenning I. (1990) STL: A seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on Loess. J Off Stat 6: 3-73
↵8 https://www.statsmodels.org/stable/generated/statsmodels.tsa.seasonal.STL.html
Data Availability
All data, codes, and simulation models are publicly available.