Abstract
Background Cognitive impairment is common following critical illness. A number of case reports and case series have suggested that cognitive deficits occur in patients with COVID-19. This study evaluated the frequency, severity, and profile of cognitive dysfunction in hospitalized patients recovering from COVID-19.
Methods We obtained and analyzed cross-sectional neuropsychological data from a cohort of N=57 patients participating in inpatient rehabilitation. Our primary outcome measure was the Brief Memory and Executive Test (BMET). We calculated the frequency of impairment based on clinician diagnosis and by the BMET subtests using age-normed classification of impairment. We explored associations with intubation and extubation as markers of illness severity and complications, as well as psychiatric diagnosis.
Outcomes Our sample was 75% male, 61% non-white, with a mean age of 64.5 (SD = 13.9) years. Patients were evaluated at a mean of 43.2 days post-admission. 88% had documented hypoxemic respiratory failure and 77% required intubation. 81% of patients had cognitive impairment, ranging from mild to severe. Deficits were most common in working memory (55% of patients impaired), set-shifting (47%), divided attention (46%), and processing speed (40%). Executive dysfunction was not significantly associated with intubation length or the time from extubation to assessment, nor was it associated with the presence of a psychiatric diagnosis.
Interpretation Medically stable inpatients recovering from COVID-19 commonly have deficits in attention and executive functions. These deficits were not significantly correlated with length of intubation or time since extubation. Findings provide an early benchmark for studying the evolution of cognitive difficulties after COVID-19 and suggest that easy to disseminate interventions that remediate attention and executive dysfunctions may be important in this population.
Funding The authors have no funding for this study to report.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
N/A (Retrospective study using data extracted from electronic medical record, approved by the Weill Cornell Medicine Institutional Review Board).
Funding Statement
No external funding was received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All procedures were approved by the Weill Cornell Medicine Institutional Review Board. Data were captured retrospectively from the electronic medical record and thus consent was waived.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data for this study are not currently available.
