Abstract
Imaging studies of young people with a family history of alcohol use disorder (AUD) have found structural and/or functional differences within and between anatomically distributed and functionally specialised systems throughout the brain. Differences in brain connectivity among adolescents with a family history of AUD may account for the increased risk of later alcohol use problems; however, to date, no prospective studies have directly examined this hypothesis across the entire connectome in a regionally unbiased way. Our analysis included 52 adolescents (Mage = 16.5 years ± 0.6 SD) assessed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, of whom 20 had a family history of AUD and 32 did not. All participants were followed-up 2.3 years later and completed a questionnaire measuring past year alcohol use and alcohol-related harms. Subject-specific connectomic maps of structural connectivity were constructed using two parcellation schemes (82-node anatomical and 530-node random) and five measures of connectivity weight (streamline count, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity), and a connectome-wide network-based statistic analysis was used to compare group differences at each and every connection between adolescents with and without a family history of AUD. Baseline connectivity measures did not differentiate these groups, and we did not find an association between baseline connectivity measures and alcohol outcomes at follow-up. These findings suggest that atypical inter-regional structural connectivity may not contribute to the risk of developing alcohol use problems in this particular age group, or during this particular period of development.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by grants from the Colonial Foundation, the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC; Program Grant 350241; Fellowships 1021973, 1047648, and 1007716), and the Australian Research Council (ARC; Discovery Grants DP0878136 and DP1092637; Fellowship FT130100589). Simon T. E. Baker was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Author Note Simon T. E. Baker is now at Black Dog Institute. Nicholas B. Allen is now at Department of Psychology, University of Oregon.
This research was supported by grants from the Colonial Foundation, the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC; Program Grant 350241; Fellowships 1021973, 1047648, and 1007716), and the Australian Research Council (ARC; Discovery Grants DP0878136 and DP1092637; Fellowship FT130100589). Simon T. E. Baker was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award. The authors would like to thank the adolescents and their families for participating in the Orygen Adolescent Development Study.
Data Availability
Data may be available on request
