Abstract
Introduction Emerging data from Africa indicates remarkably low numbers of reported COVID-19 deaths despite high levels of disease transmission. However evolution of these trends as the pandemic progresses remains unknown. More certain are the devastating long-term impacts of the pandemic on health and development evident globally. Research tailored to the unique needs of African countries is crucial.
UKCDR and GloPID-R have launched a tracker of funded COVID-19 projects mapped to the WHO research priorities and research priorities of Africa and less-resourced countries and published a baseline analysis of a Living Systematic Review (LSR) of these projects.
Methods In-depth analyses of the baseline LSR for COVID-19 funded research projects in Africa (as of 15th July 2020) to determine the funding landscape and alignment of the projects to research priorities of relevance to Africa.
Results The limited COVID-19 related research across Africa appears to be supported mainly by international funding, especially from Europe, although with notably limited funding from United States-based funders. At the time of this analysis no research projects funded by an African-based funder were identified in the tracker although there are several active funding calls geared at research in Africa and there may be funding data which has not been made publicly available.
Many projects mapped to the WHO research priorities and 5 particular gaps in research funding were identified namely: investigating the role of children in COVID-19 transmission; effective modes of community engagement; health systems research; communication of uncertainties surrounding mother-to-child transmission of COVID-19; and identifying ways to promote international cooperation. Capacity strengthening was identified as a dominant theme in funded research project plans.
Conclusions We found significantly lower funding investments in COVID-19 research in Africa compared to High-Income Countries, seven months into the pandemic, indicating a paucity of research targeting the research priorities of relevance to Africa.
What is already known?
There has been a swift global research response to the COVID-19 pandemic guided by priorities outlined in the WHO Research Roadmap and hundreds of research activities have rapidly been commissioned.
The research priorities for Africa are likely to be influenced by unique contextual factors which could worsen the prognosis of infections and influence measures for disease prevention and control and indirect long-term disease impacts.
Remarkably, there has been a low number of reported COVID-19 mortalities despite emerging evidence of high levels of transmission in Africa.
What are the new findings?
We present the most comprehensive assessment of COVID-19 research investments in Africa seven months into this pandemic and found significantly less research investments in Africa, given that only 84 out of 1858 research projects identified globally involved at least one African country.
Several important gaps in funded research in Africa were identified indicating some areas requiring greater research focus.
The dominant capacity strengthening theme in funded research projects highlights insufficient pandemic research preparedness of African countries.
What do the new findings imply?
An assessment of the alignment of funded research projects in Africa to important global and regional research priorities is imperative for gaining key insights into the trends of disease, guiding research funding investments, prevention and control strategies and learning lessons for future pandemics.
In this context of limited resources, investments in research in Africa must be targeted at the most pressing research needs for effective control of this pandemic.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The COVID CIRCLE initiative is funded by Wellcome, UK DHSC and UKRI. COVID CIRCLE is also supported by core funding to UKCDR from DFID, UK BEIS, UKRI, UK DHSC, Wellcome and DEFRA and by in-kind contributions from the GloPID-R Secretariat funded by the European Unions Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreements 643434 and 874667
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Not applicable
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data referred to in this manuscript are from open access research platforms. The UKCDR/GloPID-R tracker of funded COVID-19 Research Projects is available at https://www.ukcdr.org.uk/funding-landscape/covid-19-research-project-tracker/ Baseline Living Systematic Review of COVID-19 Funded Research Projects is available at https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/5-209
https://www.ukcdr.org.uk/funding-landscape/covid-19-research-project-tracker/