Abstract
Background Vaccinations are the best hope to control the COVID-19 pandemic and save lives. Due to the high demand and failure to share vaccines equitably, there were not enough vaccine supplies to cover the majority of people in low- and middle-income countries during the early stage of vaccination. To cope with this problem, Thailand, an upper-middle-income country, decided to employ a heterologous vaccination strategy as the primary COVID-19 vaccination regimen in the country. The CoronaVac (CV) vaccine was administered as the first dose, followed by the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZ) vaccine as the second dose. However, there is no study to assess the effectiveness of the heterologous vaccination employed in Thailand compared to the standard homologous vaccination.
Methods We delineated the course and timeline of COVID-19 vaccination in Thailand. An age-structured compartmental model for COVID-19 transmission and vaccination was constructed and employed to assess the effectiveness of the heterologous vaccination strategy. The impact of the vaccine prioritization strategies on COVID-19 mortality and infections was also investigated.
Results We found that the CV+AZ heterologous vaccination strategy outperforms the separate CV and AZ homologous vaccinations in reducing cumulative cases and deaths when combined with other non-pharmaceutical interventions. Furthermore, the results suggested that prioritizing vaccines for the elderly could be optimal in reducing COVID-19 mortality for a wide range of vaccination rates and disease transmission dynamics.
Conclusions Our modeling results suggested that to minimize the impacts of inequity in early COVID-19 vaccine access in low- and middle-income countries, those countries may use early accessible but maybe lower-efficacy vaccines as the first dose of heterologous vaccination in combination with higher-efficacy vaccines as the second dose when they are available.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was financially supported by the Centre of Excellence in Mathematics, Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, Thailand, Center of Excellence on Medical Biotechnology (CEMB), and Thailand Center of Excellence in Physics (ThEP).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.