We investigated whether expressing anger increases social influence for men, but
diminishes social influence for women, during group deliberation. In a deception paradigm, …

… Special thanks are due to Bette Bottoms, who coauthored with Jessica Salerno the paper
that set the groundwork and provided the inspiration for this one. Thanks are also due to Devin …

Despite much psychological research regarding jury decision making, surprisingly little is
known about the deliberation process that gives rise to jury verdicts. We review classic jury …

In three studies, we investigated support for applying sex offender registry laws to juveniles.
Family law attorneys supported registry laws less for juveniles than for adults. Laypeople …

The two studies reported here demonstrated that a combination of anger and disgust predicts
moral outrage. In Study 1, anger toward moral transgressions (sexual assault, funeral …

Although trial judges admonish jurors to avoid being influenced by personal biases, social
psychological theories suggest that stereotypes can influence jurors' case judgments. Further, …

Emotion expression is a key part of trial advocacy. Attorneys are advised to gain credibility
with juries by demonstrating conviction through anger expression. In 3 experiments, we tested …

Expressing anger can signal that someone is certain and competent, thereby increasing their
social influence—but does this strategy work for everyone? After assessing gender- and …

Objective: Recently, experimental work on racial bias in legal settings has diverged from real-world
field data demonstrating racial disparities, instead often producing null or potential …

This article is a review of psychological and neuroscience research addressing how juror
decision making is influenced by emotion elicited from potentially disturbing evidence such as …