The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow
users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred …

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement,
published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why …

Objectives To describe the processes used to update the PRISMA 2009 statement for
reporting systematic reviews, present results of a survey conducted to inform the update, …

In systematic reviews that lack data amenable to meta-analysis, alternative synthesis methods
are commonly used, but these methods are rarely reported. This lack of transparency in …

Background There is little systematic operational guidance about how best to develop complex
interventions to reduce the gap between practice and evidence. This article is one in a …

Background Tobacco smoking remains one of the few preventable factors associated with
complications in pregnancy, and has serious long‐term implications for women and babies. …

Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to a decay in
review currency, accuracy, and utility. We are developing a novel approach to systematic …

A range of statistical synthesis methods are available, and these may be divided into three
categories based on their preferability. Preferable methods are the meta‐analysis methods. …

This chapter describes the processes by which the structure of the synthesis can be mapped
out at the beginning of the systematic review, and the interplay between the review question…

Background Depressive disorders are common in young people and are associated with
significant negative impacts. Newer generation antidepressants, particularly selective serotonin …