Keywords
Bile acid synthesis, metabolic regulation, gut microbiota
Bile acid synthesis, metabolic regulation, gut microbiota
Bile acid synthesis is tightly regulated by a network of feedback mechanisms that is complex and not completely understood. Alteration of bile acid homeostasis affects hepatic metabolic homeostasis and causes hepatic inflammation and pathogenesis of metabolic diseases such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), diabetes, and inflammatory bowel diseases. Recent research using mouse genetic models and human patients has shown that bile acids are signaling molecules that activate nuclear farnesoid X receptor (FXR), membrane G protein-coupled bile acid receptor-1 (Gpbar-1, also known as Takeda G protein-coupled receptor 5, or TGR5), and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 (S1PR2) to regulate not only bile acid synthesis in the liver but also lipid, glucose, and energy metabolism in tissues, including the liver, intestine, macrophages, and adipose tissues. Many investigators are not familiar with the concepts of bile acid homeostasis or bile acid pool and composition in maintaining metabolic homeostasis. This review will briefly discuss recent advances in understanding how bile acid homeostasis is maintained by (1) the classic bile acid synthesis pathway versus the alternative bile acid synthesis pathway, (2) regulation of bile acid pool size versus composition, (3) FXR signaling in liver versus intestine, and (4) the gut microbiota-to-liver axis. Only key references published in last 3–4 years are cited.
Bile acid synthesis involves about a dozen enzymes located in the cytosol, endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and peroxisomes to convert cholesterol to bile acids in hepatocytes1. There are two major pathways, the classic (or neutral) pathway and the alternative (or acidic, sterol 27-hydroxylase [CYP27A1]) pathway in the liver (Figure 1). The classic pathway starts with modifications of the steroid rings by hydroxylation, isomerization, and reduction/dehydroxylation enzymes located in cytosol and endoplasmic reticulum, followed by steroid side-chain oxidation in mitochondria and oxidative cleavage of the side chain in peroxisomes. The alternative pathway starts with oxidation of the steroid side chain and followed by 7α hydroxylation of the steroid ring to form oxidized steroid intermediates.
The classic pathway of bile acid synthesis is initiated by the rate-limiting enzyme cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1) to form 7α-hydroxycholesterol, which is converted to 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (named C4). C4 is the common precursor of cholic acid (CA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA). Serum C4 level is now used as a biomarker for the rate of bile acid synthesis. C4 can be used for CA synthesis involving sterol 12α-hydroxylase (CYP8B1). Without 12α-hydroxylation, C4 is converted to CDCA. Mitochondrial CYP27A1 catalyzes the steroid side-chain oxidation, followed by peroxisomal β-oxidation to cleave a 3-C propionyl group from the side chain to form C24-bile acids (Figure 1). The alternative pathway is initiated by CYP27A1 and is followed by a non-specific oxysterol 7α-hydroxylase (CYP7B1) in the liver, steroidogenic tissues, and macrophages. In the brain, cholesterol is converted to 24-hydroxycholesterol by sterol 24-hydroxylase (CYP46A1), followed by a brain-specific cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (CYP39A1). In mouse and human liver, cholesterol 25-hydroxylase (CH25H, not a CYP enzyme) converts cholesterol to 25-hydroxycholesterol, which is the most abundant oxysterol in serum and can be used for synthesis bile acids in the liver. There is a misconception that the alternative pathway synthesizes CDCA only. However, the oxysterol intermediates formed in the extrahepatic tissues can be transported to the liver for synthesis of both CDCA (~70%) and CA (~30%). Many investigators assay CYP27A1 expression as a marker for the alternative pathway. It should be noted that CYP27A1 is required for bile acid synthesis in both classic and alternative pathways. CYP27A1 is not a rate-limiting enzyme in the alternative pathway, because CYP27A1 is highly expressed in most tissues. CYP7B1 is a marker for the alternative pathway. In mouse liver, CDCA is converted to α-muricholic acid (α-MCA) by a newly identified sterol 6β-hydroxylase (Cyp2c70). The 7α-OH group in α-MCA is epimerized to 7β-OH to form β-MCA2. The conjugated bile acids are secreted into bile via the canalicular bile salt export pump to form mixed micelles with cholesterol and phosphatidylcholine in the canalicular and stored in the gallbladder. Meal intake stimulates cholecystokinin secretion from the pancreas to stimulate gallbladder contraction to release bile acids into the gastrointestinal tract. Some bile acids are passively absorbed in the upper intestine, but most are actively absorbed via apical sodium-dependent bile salt transport peptide in the ileum and colon where gut microbial bile salt hydrolase (BSH) de-conjugates bile acids to free bile acids, then bacterial 7α-dehydroxylase converts CA and CDCA to deoxycholic acid (DCA) and lithocholic acid (LCA), respectively. Some free bile acids (DCA and CA) may cross the colonic epithelium by passive diffusion. LCA is sulfur-conjugated and excreted into feces. A small amount of LCA circulated to the liver is rapidly sulfur-conjugated by bile salt sulfotransferases (SULTs), and excreted into urine. In mouse liver, LCA can be converted to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) by 7β-hydroxylase as a primary bile acid. Human liver synthesizes very little UDCA (~1%).
In the enterocytes, bile acids bind to ileum bile acid binding protein and trans-cross to the sinusoidal membrane, where organic solute transporter α (Ostα) and Ostβ heterodimer excreted bile acids to portal blood for circulation back to hepatocytes. Enterohepatic circulation of bile acids is a highly efficient physiological pathway, which recovers about 95% of bile acids in the pool and serves as a feedback mechanism to inhibit CYP7A1 gene transcription and bile acid synthesis and maintain bile acid homeostasis in humans. In rats, enterohepatic circulation of bile acids is less efficient than in humans and the bile acid pool size is larger, and this may be due to absence of the gallbladder and relatively long intestine for the body size and higher bile acid synthesis rate. The Cyp7a1-specific activity in rat liver is about 100-fold higher than in human and mouse liver.
CYP7A1 is the only rate-limiting enzyme in the classic bile acid synthesis pathway. CYP8B1 is at the branch point for CA and CDCA synthesis and determines the ratio of 12α-hydroxylated bile acids (CA and DCA) to non-12α-hydroxylated bile acids (CDCA and LCA) in the bile acid pool. CA has the lowest critical micellar concentration (~50 μM) among all bile acids and is highly efficient for mixed micelle formation with cholesterol and phosphatidylcholine in bile and for absorption of dietary cholesterol in enterocytes. For that reason, CA is added in a high-cholesterol diet (lithogenic diet, 0.2% cholesterol and 0.5% CA) to accelerate hypercholesterolemia in rodents. It has been reported that the increased ratio of serum 12α-hydroxylated bile acids to non-12α-hydroxylated bile acids is associated with insulin resistance in humans3. The alternative (acidic) pathway is the major pathway for bile acid synthesis in the neonate. After weaning, CYP7A1 is expressed and the classic pathway becomes the major pathway for bile acid synthesis in adult liver. The classic pathway is the predominant pathway for synthesis of bile acids in human liver, whereas the classic and alternative pathways contribute about equally to bile acid synthesis in rodents. In patients with bile acid synthesis deficiency in the classic pathway, the alternative pathway is used to produce bile acids. In Cyp7a1−/− mice, the alternative pathway is stimulated to produce bile acids to maintain a smaller but more hydrophilic bile acid pool with reduced tauro-cholic acid (TCA) and increased T-MCAs and taurodeoxycholic acid4.
Bile acid pool size: The bile acid pool is defined as the total bile acids circulating in the enterohepatic circulation, including bile acids in the liver (~1–2 %), intestine (~75–80%), and gallbladder (~15–20%). Small amounts (~1%) of bile acids spilled over from the circulation to serum and urine are not included in the pool. During cholestatic liver injury, serum bile acids are increased and cause jaundice. It is therapeutically important to assay the total bile acid pool size and changes in bile acid contents in the liver, intestine, and gallbladder bile.
Bile acid composition: Most bile acids in the pool are conjugated bile acids. Bile acid composition is different in the liver, gallbladder, intestine (ileum, cecum, and colon), feces, and serum. The gallbladder bile acid composition (bile) more closely represents the bile acids in the pool, including bile acids synthesized in the liver and circulated from enterohepatic circulation. Most studies report bile acid composition in serum, which does not represent bile acid composition in the pool. Whenever possible, bile acid composition in bile or liver should be determined to represent bile acid composition in the pool. In humans, bile acid pool consists of CA (~40%), CDCA (~40%), and DCA (~20%), the ratio of glycine- to taurine-conjugated bile acids is about 3 to 1, and the pool is highly hydrophobic. In mice, most bile acids are taurine-conjugated, the bile acid pool consists of CA (~60%) and α-MCA and β-MCA (~40%), and the pool is highly hydrophilic. Increased bile acid hydrophobicity index has been linked to cholesterol gallstone formation.
Feeding hydrophilic bile acids (such as T-MCA) inhibits intestinal cholesterol absorption, while feeding CA increases cholesterol absorption. Ablation of Cyp8b1 (Cyp8b1−/−) prevents atherosclerosis in Apoe−/− mice. Cyp8b1−/− mice have improved glucose homeostasis by increased GLP-1 secretion5. Germ-free mice, Cyp8b1−/− mice, and antibiotic-treated mice share common phenotypes; that is, all have increased CYP7A1 expression and enlarged bile acid pool with reduced TCA and increased T-MCA compared to wild type mice, and these mice are resistant from diet-induced obesity (DIO)6. In transgenic mice overexpressing Cyp7a1 (Cyp7a-Tg), increasing bile acid synthesis stimulates de novo cholesterol synthesis, biliary bile acid and cholesterol secretion, and fecal excretion to maintain bile acid and cholesterol homeostasis and prevent DIO and diabetes7. Bile acid sequestrants reduce bile acid pool size, induce bile acid synthesis, and reduce intracellular cholesterol. As a consequence, de novo cholesterol synthesis, as well as low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-mediated uptake of LDL cholesterol, is stimulated to reduce hypercholesterolemia. On the other hand, Cyp7a1−/− mice have a reduced bile acid pool size but surprisingly, also have improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity4. In Cyp7a1−/− mice, bile acid synthesis is switched to the alternative pathway to produce less TCA but more T-αMCA and T-βMCA, which antagonizes intestinal FXR activity to reduce ceramide synthesis and increase insulin sensitivity. Thus, bile acid composition, rather than bile acid pool size, plays an important role in regulation of bile acid and cholesterol homeostasis and protects against DIO and insulin resistance.
Emerging research in the last two decades has uncovered that bile acids are endogenous signaling molecules that activate the nuclear receptor FXR and membrane (TGR5, also known as Gpbar-1) and S1PR2 in the gastrointestinal system7. Extensive experiments in mice and humans have demonstrated that FXR and TGR5 play critical roles in the regulation of bile acid synthesis and homeostasis (Figure 1). However, the physiological role of these signaling pathways under normal physiological conditions is still not clear and not completely understood. Also, most studies were performed in mice, which have a very different bile acid composition and pool size compared with humans.
FXR signaling has been shown to play important roles in the regulation of metabolism in the liver, intestine, and adipose tissues. In the liver, CDCA (EC50, effective concentration that gives half maximal response, = ~17 μM) activates FXR to induce the negative nuclear receptor small heterodimer partner (SHP) to inhibit transcription of the CYP7A1 and CYP8B1 genes (Figure 1). In mice, CA is the predominant bile acid in the bile acid pool but is a very weak FXR agonist (EC50 = ~0.59 mM). It is not likely that the hepatic TCA concentration (~100 μM) is high enough to activate FXR under normal physiological conditions. The FXR/SHP mechanism may be activated when bile acids are accumulated at high levels in hepatocytes under cholestatic conditions to inhibit bile acid synthesis as an adaptive response to liver injury. The intestinal FXR/FGF15/hepatic FGF receptor 4/β-Klotho pathway may activate JNK/ERK of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway to inhibit CYP7A1 and CYP8B1 gene transcription (Figure 1). This may be a more physiologically relevant pathway mediating bile acid feedback via enterohepatic circulation to regulate bile acid synthesis.
Secondary bile acids (LCA, EC50 = ~0.03 μM; DCA, EC50 = ~1 μM) produced in the intestine (colon) by gut bacteria activate TGR5 signaling, which induces cAMP/PKA signaling to stimulate energy metabolism in brown adipose tissue, relax and refill the gallbladder, and secrete glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) from intestinal endocrine L cells (Figure 1)8. A recent study reports that TGR5 may be involved in the regulation of CYP7B1, a sexually dimorphic and male-predominant gene in the alternative bile acid synthesis pathway9. Activation of TGR5 in macrophages and Kupffer cells inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokine production and cholangiocyte proliferation10.
S1PR2 is a TCA-activated Gαi protein-coupled receptor, which activates ERK1/2 and AKT in hepatocytes and cholangiocytes11. It has been shown that bile acids activate ERK1/2 and JNK/cJun to inhibit Cyp7a1 and Cyp8b1 gene transcription (Figure 1). However, the role of the S1PR2 pathway in the regulation of bile acid synthesis is not clear and requires further study.
The gut-to-liver axis plays a critical role in bile acid metabolism. Bile acids control gut bacteria overgrowth and the gut microbiota regulates bile acids synthesis, bile acid pool size and composition, and enterohepatic circulation of bile acids. Bile acids reshape the gut microbiome, which has great impact on host metabolism and metabolic diseases12–15. Activation of FXR by specific agonists inhibits bile acid and fatty acid synthesis and improves glucose and insulin sensitivity in obese and diabetic mice. However, reported results are not consistent and are controversial7. In general, activation of liver FXR signaling is beneficial for primary biliary cirrhosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) by reducing bile acid pool and progression to fibrosis16,17.
The role of intestinal FXR signaling in metabolic regulation is controversial. Deficiency of intestinal FXR or antagonizing FXR by an antioxidant, Tempol or Gly-MCA, an MCA derivative that is resistant to BSH activity, prevents DIO18,19. T-MCA has been shown to antagonize intestinal FXR activity and improve DIO and weight gain in mice and human patients20–22. Inhibition of intestinal FXR reduces ceramide synthesis and modulates hepatic gluconeogenesis in mice23. In contrast, the intestine-restricted FXR agonist fexaramine reduces weight and insulin resistance and may occur via FGF15-mediated adipocyte browning24. Activation of intestinal FXR and TGR5 crosstalk in intestinal L cells stimulates TGR5-mediated GLP-1 secretion to improve insulin sensitivity8. Activation of FXR by GW4064 in intestinal L cells was shown to decrease proglucagon expression by interfering with glucose-responsive carbohydrate-response element binding protein and GLP-1 secretion25. Bile acids are known to stimulate glucose-induced GLP-1 secretion. It is possible that mice housed in different facilities, their genetic background, and differential effects of FXR agonists on gut microbiota contribute to the observed paradoxical effects on glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity.
Bile acid signaling regulates hepatic metabolism via FXR signaling in the liver and intestine, and TGR5 in the intestine, to modulate the gut microbiome, host metabolism, and diseases. The emerging research in bile acid metabolism and homeostasis has been translated to drug therapy for liver diseases, NASH, and diabetes and obesity. Most bile acid research is conducted in mouse models, which have a very different bile acid composition and pool size. Gender differences in bile acids and microbiota in diet-induced steatosis have been reported and need to be further studied26,27. Bile acid receptors are signaling integrators and have emerged as therapeutic targets for the treatment of dyslipidemia, NAFLD, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases17,28. Bariatric surgeries are effective in reducing weight and improving insulin resistance in obese patients, and FXR and TGR5 signaling have been implicated in increasing serum bile acids and FGF19 after bariatric surgery29–31. However, the underlying mechanism of bile acid signaling in improving diabetes after bariatric surgery is not clear and needs to be elucidated to develop therapeutic strategies to cure diabetes and NAFLD.
BSH, bile salt hydrolase; C4, 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one; CA, cholic acid; CDCA, chenodeoxycholic acid; CYP7A1, cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase; CYP7B1, oxysterol 7α-hydroxylase; CYP8B1, sterol 12α-hydroxylase; CYP27A1, sterol 27-hydroxylase; DCA, deoxycholic acid; DIO, diet-induced obesity; EC50, concentration of a drug that gives half-maximal response; FGF15, fibroblast growth factor 15; FXR, farnesoid X receptor; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide 1; Gpbar-1, G protein–coupled bile acid receptor-1; LCA, lithocholic acid; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MCA, muricholic acid; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; Ost, organic solute transporter; S1PR2, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2; SHP, small heterodimer partner; T-MCA, tauro-muricholic acid; TCA, tauro-cholic acid; TGR5, Takeda G protein receptor 5; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid.
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grants DK44442 and DK58379.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 20 Nov 17 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)