Abstract
Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) is most often caused by hemizygous deletion of a 1.5-Mb interval encompassing at least 17 genes at 7q11.23 (refs. 1,2). As with many other haploinsufficiency diseases, the mechanism underlying the WBS deletion is thought to be unequal meiotic recombination, probably mediated by the highly homologous DNA that flanks the commonly deleted region3. Here, we report the use of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to identify a genomic polymorphism in families with WBS, consisting of an inversion of the WBS region. We have observed that the inversion is hemizygous in 3 of 11 (27%) atypical affected individuals who show a subset of the WBS phenotypic spectrum but do not carry the typical WBS microdeletion. Two of these individuals also have a parent who carries the inversion. In addition, in 4 of 12 (33%) families with a proband carrying the WBS deletion, we observed the inversion exclusively in the parent transmitting the disease-related chromosome. These results suggest the presence of a newly identified genomic variant within the population that may be associated with the disease. It may result in predisposition to primarily WBS-causing microdeletions, but may also cause translocations and inversions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b81fe/b81fed3dd10c219f096f810eea2912748267b0d7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dc14/8dc14b5777cb1dd27f0f2e4ae5c99aae42688b8c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/871f5/871f528bafc02141bfd0a9f37db7178edb7e8bf0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57c2e/57c2e2e094e85f6e2593b36cb60eaa476be12dbd" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81ada/81ada848ee33356211b9220e0ec0b60c931b5ad7" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ewart, A.K. et al. Hemizygosity at the elastin locus in a developmental disorder, Williams syndrome. Nature Genet. 5, 11–16 (1993).
Osborne, L.R. Williams-Beuren syndrome—unraveling the mysteries of a microdeletion disorder. Mol. Genet. Metab. 67, 1–10 (1999).
Baumer, A. et al. High level of unequal meiotic crossovers at the origin of the 22q11. 2 and 7q11.23 deletions. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 887–894 (1998).
Greenberg, F. Williams syndrome professional symposium. Am. J. Med. Genet. Suppl. 6, 85–88 (1990).
Pober, B.R. & Dykens, E.M. Williams syndrome: an overview of medical, cognitive, and behavioural features. Child Adoles. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 5, 929–943 (1996).
Lowery, M.C. et al. Strong correlation of elastin deletions, detected by FISH, with Williams syndrome: evaluation of 235 patients. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 57, 49–53 (1995).
Nickerson, E., Greenberg, F., Keating, M.T., McCaskill, C. & Shaffer, L.G. Deletions of the elastin gene at 7q11.23 occur in approximately 90% of patients with Williams syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 56, 1156–1161 (1995).
Mari, A. et al. Analysis of the elastin gene in 60 patients with clinical diagnosis of Williams syndrome. Hum. Genet. 96, 444–448 (1995).
Frangiskakis, J.M. et al. LIM-kinase1 hemizygosity implicated in impaired visuospatial constructive cognition. Cell 86, 59–69 (1996).
Botta, A. et al. Detection of an atypical 7q11.23 deletion in Williams syndrome patients which does not include the STX1A and FZD3 genes. J. Med. Genet. 36, 478–480 (1999).
Tassabehji, M. et al. Williams syndrome: use of chromosomal microdeletions as a tool to dissect cognitive and physical phenotypes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64, 118–125 (1999).
von Dadelszen, P. et al. De novo 46,XX,t(6;7)(q27;q11;23) associated with severe cardiovascular manifestations characteristic of supravalvular aortic stenosis and Williams syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. 90, 270–275 (2000).
Perez-Jurado, L.A. et al. A duplicated gene in the breakpoint regions of the 7q11.23 Williams-Beuren syndrome deletion encodes the initiator binding protein TFII-I and BAP-135, a phosphorylation target of BTK. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 325–334 (1998).
Osborne, L.R. et al. PMS2-related genes flank the rearrangement breakpoints associated with Williams syndrome and other disease on human chromosome 7. Genomics 45, 402–406 (1997).
Pezzi, N. et al. STAG3, a novel gene encoding a protein involved in meiotic chromosome pairing and location of STAG3-related genes flanking the Williams-Beuren syndrome deletion. FASEB J. 14, 581–592 (2000).
Görlach, A. et al. A p47–phox pseudogene carries the most common mutation causing p47–phox-deficient chronic granulomatous disease. J. Clin. Invest. 100, 1907–1918 (1997).
Meng, X., Lu, X., Morris, C.A. & Keating, M.T. A novel human gene FKBP6 is deleted in Williams syndrome. Genomics 52, 130–137 (1998).
Chute, I., Le, Y., Ashley, T. & Dobson, M.J. The telomere-associated DNA from human chromosome 20p contains a pseudotelomere structure and shares sequences with the subtelomeric regions of 4q and 18p. Genomics 46, 51–60 (1997).
Lakich, D., Kazazian, H.H. Jr, Antonarakis, S.E. & Gitschier, J. Inversions disrupting the factor VIII gene are a common cause of severe haemophilia A. Nature Genet. 5, 236–241 (1993).
Small, K., Iber, J. & Warren, S.T. Emerin deletion reveals a common X-chromosome inversion mediated by inverted repeats. Nature Genet. 16, 96–99 (1997).
Jobling, M.A. et al. A selective difference between human Y-chromosomal DNA haplotypes. Curr. Biol. 8, 1391–1394 (1998).
Ji, Y., Eichler, E.E., Schwartz, S. & Nicholls, R.D. Structure of chromosomal duplicons and their role in mediating human genomic disorders. Genome Res. 10, 597–610 (2000).
Peoples, R. et al. A physical map, including a BAC/PAC clone contig, of the Williams-Beuren syndrome–deletion region at 7q11.23. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 47–68 (2000).
Valero, M.C., de Luis, O., Cruces, J. & Perez Jurado, L.A. Fine-scale comparative mapping of the human 7q11.23 region and the orthologous region on mouse chromosome 5G: the low-copy repeats that flank the Williams-Beuren syndrome deletion arose at breakpoint sites of an evolutionary inversion(s). Genomics 69, 1–13 (2000).
Giglio, S. et al. Olfactory receptor-gene clusters, genomic-inversion polymorphisms, and common chromosome rearrangements. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68, 874–883 (2001).
Kara-Mostefa, A. et al. Recurrent Williams-Beuren syndrome in a sibship suggestive of maternal germline mosaicism. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64, 1475–1478 (1999).
Schwartz, S. et al. PipMaker—a web server for aligning two genomic DNA sequences. Genome Res. 10, 577–586 (2000).
Heng, H.H. & Tsui, L.C. Modes of DAPI banding and simultaneous in situ hybridization. Chromosoma 102, 325–332 (1993).
Heng, H.H., Squire, J. & Tsui, L.C. High-resolution mapping of mammalian genes by in situ hybridization to free chromatin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 9509–9513 (1992).
Crackower, M.A. et al. Characterization of the split hand/split foot malformation locus SHFM1 at 7q21.3-q22.1 and analysis of a candidate gene for its expression during limb development. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 571–579 (1996).
Acknowledgements
We thank the affected families and their clinical support staff for continued assistance on this project, as well as The Centre for Applied Genomics at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, the Canadian Genetic Diseases Network, and P. Marsden for technical support. The work is sponsored by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR). L.C.T. is a Distinguished Scientist of the CIHR and Seller Chair of Cystic Fibrosis Research; L.R.O. and S.W.S. are Scholars of the CIHR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Osborne, L., Li, M., Pober, B. et al. A 1.5 million–base pair inversion polymorphism in families with Williams-Beuren syndrome. Nat Genet 29, 321–325 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng753
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng753