RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Cycles of self-reported seizure likelihood correspond to yield of diagnostic epilepsy monitoring
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.05.20207407
DO 10.1101/2020.10.05.20207407
A1 Karoly, Philippa J.
A1 Eden, Dominique
A1 Nurse, Ewan S.
A1 Cook, Mark J.
A1 Taylor, Janelle
A1 Dumanis, Sonya
A1 Richardson, Mark P.
A1 Brinkmann, Benjamin H.
A1 Freestone, Dean R.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/07/2020.10.05.20207407.abstract
AB Objective Video-electroencephalography (vEEG) is an important component of epilepsy diagnosis and management. Nevertheless, inpatient vEEG monitoring fails to capture seizures in up to one third of patients during diagnostic and pre-surgical monitoring. We hypothesized that personalized seizure forecasts could be used to optimize the timing of vEEG and improve diagnostic yield.Methods We used a database of ambulatory vEEG studies to select a cohort with linked electronic seizure diaries of more than 20 reported seizures over at least 8 weeks. The total cohort included 48 participants. Diary seizure times were used to detect individuals’ multi-day seizure cycles and estimate times of high seizure risk. We then compared whether estimated seizure risk was significantly different between diagnostic and non-diagnostic vEEGs, and between vEEG with and without recorded epileptic activity.Results Estimated seizure risk was significantly higher for diagnostic vEEGs and vEEGs with epileptic activity. Across all cycle strengths, the average time in high risk during vEEG was 29.1% compared with 14% for the diagnostic/non-diagnostic groups and 32% compared to 18% for the epileptic activity/no epileptic activity groups. On average, 62.5% of the cohort showed increased time in high risk during vEEG when epileptic activity was recorded (compared to 28% of the cohort where epileptic activity was not recorded). For diagnostic vEEGs, 50% of the cohort had increased time in high risk, compared to 21.5% for non-diagnostic vEEGs.Significance This study provides a proof of principle that scheduling monitoring times based on personalized seizure risk forecasts can improve the yield of vEEG. Importantly, forecasts can be developed at low cost from mobile seizure diaries. A simple scheduling tool to improve diagnostic outcomes has the potential to reduce the significant cost and risks associated with delayed or missed diagnosis in epilepsy.Key PointsSelf-reported seizure cycles, measured from electronic diaries, correspond to outcomes of diagnostic video-EEG monitoringCycle-based forecasts of seizure risk were related to both diagnostic yield and occurrence of epileptic activity during monitoringPersonalized forecasts can be used to schedule video-EEG monitoring to coincide with periods of heighted seizure riskSmart scheduling of video-EEG monitoring could improve yield and reduce the burden of delayed or missed diagnoses in epilepsyCompeting Interest StatementPJK, ESN, MJC, DRF are employees and have a financial interest in Seer Medical Pty Ltd DE, JT are employees of Seer Medical Pty Ltd.Funding StatementThis project was supported by the Epilepsy Foundation of America's Epilepsy Innovation Institute 'My Seizure Gauge' grant. This project was supported by BioMedTechHorizons Grant (#239), a program of the Australian Government's Medical Research Future Fund. PJK is supported by an Australian Government NHMRC Investigator Grant (EL1/1178220).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (SVHM HREC Code: EC00343)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesRaw data were provided by Seer Medical (mobile app and EEG). Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available via a data sharing agreement by request to the corresponding author.