RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Comparison of infection control strategies to reduce COVID-19 outbreaks in homeless shelters in the United States: a simulation study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.09.28.20203166
DO 10.1101/2020.09.28.20203166
A1 Chapman, Lloyd A.C.
A1 Kushel, Margot
A1 Cox, Sarah N.
A1 Scarborough, Ashley
A1 Cawley, Caroline
A1 Nguyen, Trang
A1 Rodriguez-Barraquer, Isabel
A1 Greenhouse, Bryan
A1 Imbert, Elizabeth
A1 Lo, Nathan C.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/29/2020.09.28.20203166.abstract
AB Background Multiple COVID-19 outbreaks have occurred in homeless shelters across the US, highlighting an urgent need to identify the most effective infection control strategy to prevent future outbreaks.Objective To estimate the probability of averting outbreaks in homeless shelters under different infection control strategies.Design Microsimulation model of COVID-19 transmission in a representative homeless shelter over 30 days under different infection control strategies, including daily symptom-based screening, twice-weekly polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) testing and universal mask wearing.Setting A shelter of 250 residents and 50 staff.Patients Residents and staff of homeless shelters in the US. Model calibrated to data from cross-sectional PCR surveys during COVID-19 outbreaks in five shelters in three US cities.Measurements Probability of averting a COVID-19 outbreak (≥3 infections in 14 days).Results Basic reproduction number (R0) estimates for the observed outbreaks ranged from 2.9 to 6.2. The probability of averting an outbreak diminished with higher transmissibility (R0) within the simulated shelter and increasing transmission intensity in the local community. With moderate transmission intensity in the local community, the estimated probabilities of averting an outbreak in a low-risk (R0=1.5), moderate-risk (R0=2.9), and high-risk (R0=6.2) shelter were: 0.33, 0.11 and 0.03 for daily symptom-based screening; 0.52, 0.27, and 0.04 for twice-weekly PCR testing; 0.47, 0.20 and 0.06 for universal masking; and 0.68, 0.40 and 0.08 for these strategies combined.Limitations R0 values calibrated to reported outbreaks may be higher than for average shelter due to smaller outbreaks going unreported.Conclusion In high-risk homeless shelter environments and locations with high community incidence of COVID-19 most infection control strategies are unlikely to prevent outbreaks. In lower-risk environments, combined interventions should be adopted to reduce outbreak risk.Primary Funding Source University of California, San Francisco; UCSF Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and the UCSF Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, preparation of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was considered exempt non-human subject research based on use of de-identified secondary data by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review BoardAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data and code used for the analysis are available at: https://github.com/LloydChapman/COVID_homeless_modelling https://github.com/LloydChapman/COVID_homeless_modelling