RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 National Longitudinal Mediators of Psychological Distress During Stringent COVID-19 Lockdown
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.09.15.20194829
DO 10.1101/2020.09.15.20194829
A1 Bulbulia, Joseph A.
A1 Piven, Sofia D.
A1 Barlow, Fiona Kate
A1 Davis, Don E.
A1 Greaves, Lara M.
A1 Highland, Benjamin
A1 Houkamau, Carla A.
A1 Milfont, Taciano L.
A1 Osborne, Danny
A1 Overall, Nickola Christine
A1 Shaver, John H.
A1 Troughton, Geoffrey
A1 Wilson, Marc
A1 Yogeeswaran, Kumar
A1 Sibley, Chris G.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/25/2020.09.15.20194829.abstract
AB We leverage powerful time-series data from a national longitudinal sample measured before the COVID-19 pandemic and during the world’s eighth most stringent COVID-19 lockdown (New Zealand, March-April 2020, N = 940) and apply Bayesian multilevel mediation models to rigorously test five theories of pandemic distress. Findings: (1) during lockdown, rest diminished distress; without rest psychological distress would have been ~ 1.74 times greater; (2) an elevated sense of community reduced distress, a little, but elevated government satisfaction was inert. Thus, the psychological benefits of lockdown extended to political discontents; (3) most lockdown distress arose from dissatisfaction from personal relationships. Social captivity, more than isolation, proved challenging; (4-5) Health and business satisfaction were stable; were they challenged substantially more distress would have ensued. Thus, lockdown benefited psychological health by affording safety, yet only because income remained secure. These national longitudinal findings clarify the mental health effects of stringent infectious disease containment.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study is supported by a grant from the Templeton Religion Trust (TRT0196). The funders had no role in any aspect of this study or the decision to publish. The authors declare no competing interests.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study was approved by The University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee on 03-June-2015 until 03-June-2018, and renewed on 05-September-2017 until 03-June-2021. Reference Number: 014889. Our previous ethics approval statement for the 2009-2015 period is: The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study was approved by The University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee on 09-September-2009 until 09-September-2012, and renewed on 17-February-2012 until 09-September-2015. Reference Number: 6171. All participants granted informed written consent and The University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee approved all procedures. All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesA de-identified dataset containing the variables analysed in this manuscript is available upon request from the corresponding author, or any member of the NZAVS advisory board for the purposes of replication or checking of any published study using NZAVS data. The code for all analyses and graphs is available on the Open Science Framework at: https://osf.io/5gza8/. Contacts for the NZAVS board: https://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/en/about/new-zealand-attitudes-and-values-study/NZAVS-research-group.html