RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 What have we learned about positive changes experienced during COVID-19 lockdown? Evidence of the social patterning of change
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.09.24.20200865
DO 10.1101/2020.09.24.20200865
A1 Williams, Lynn
A1 Rollins, Lesley
A1 Young, David
A1 Fleming, Leanne
A1 Grealy, Madeleine
A1 Janssen, Xanne
A1 Kirk, Alison
A1 MacDonald, Bradley
A1 Flowers, Paul
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/25/2020.09.24.20200865.abstract
AB Background Multiple studies have highlighted the negative impact of COVID-19 and its particular effects on vulnerable sub-populations. Complementing this work, here, we report on the social patterning of self-reported positive changes experienced during COVID-19 national lockdown in Scotland.Methods The CATALYST study collected data from 3342 adults in Scotland during weeks 9-12 of a national lockdown. Participants completed an online questionnaire providing data on key sociodemographic and health variables, and completed a measure of positive change. The positive change measure spanned diverse domains (e.g., more quality time with family, developing new hobbies, more physical activity, and better quality of sleep). We used univariate analysis and stepwise regression to examine the contribution of a range of sociodemographic factors (e.g., age, gender, ethnicity, educational attainment, and employment status) in explaining positive change.Results There were clear sociodemographic differences across positive change scores. Those reporting higher levels of positive change were female, from younger age groups, married or living with their partner, employed, and in better health.Conclusion Overall our results highlight the social patterning of positive changes during lockdown in Scotland. These findings begin to illuminate the complexity of the unanticipated effects of national lockdown and will be used to support future intervention development work sharing lessons learned from lockdown to increase positive health change amongst those who may benefit.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding was provided by the Chief Scientist Office in Scotland (Ref: COV/SCL/20/09).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde ethics committeeAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data will be available on publication of the paper on the Open Science Framework http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NWH48 http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NWH48