PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Meyer, Benjamin AU - Reimerink, Johan AU - Torriani, Giulia AU - Brouwer, Fion AU - Godeke, Gert-Jan AU - Yerly, Sabine AU - Hoogerwerf, Marieke AU - Vuilleumier, Nicolas AU - Kaiser, Laurent AU - Eckerle, Isabella AU - Reusken, Chantal TI - Validation and clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test (sVNT) AID - 10.1101/2020.09.21.20191288 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.09.21.20191288 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/23/2020.09.21.20191288.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/23/2020.09.21.20191288.full AB - To understand SARS-CoV-2 immunity after natural infection or vaccination, functional assays such as virus neutralizing assays are needed. So far, assays to determine SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies rely on cell-culture based infection assays either using wild type SARS-CoV-2 or pseudotyped viruses. Such assays are labour-intensive, require appropriate biosafety facilities and are difficult to standardize.Recently, a new surrogate virus neutralisation assay (sVNT) was described that uses the principle of an ELISA to measure the neutralization capacity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies directed against the receptor binding domain.Here, we performed an independent evaluation of the robustness, specificity and sensitivity on an extensive panel of sera from 269 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases and 259 unmatched samples collected before 2020 and compared it to cell-based neutralization assays. We found a high specificity of 99.2 (95%CI: 96.9-99.9) and overall sensitivity of 80.3 (95%CI: 74.9-84.8) for the sVNT. Clinical sensitivity increased between early (< 14 days post symptom onset or post diagnosis, dpos/dpd) and late sera (>14 dpos/dpd) from 75.0 (64.7-83.2) to 83.1 (76.5-88.1). Also, higher severity was associated with an increase in clinical sensitivity. Upon comparison with cell-based neutralisation assays we determined an analytical sensitivity of 74.3 (56.4-86.9) and 98.2 (89.4-99.9) for titres ≥10 to < 40 and ≥40 to < 160, respectively. Only samples with a titre ≥160 were always positive in the sVNT.In conclusion, the sVNT can be used as an additional assay to determine the immune status of COVID-19 infected of vaccinated individuals but its value needs to be assessed for the specific context of use.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was support by a grant from the Private Foundation of the Geneva University Hospital.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:RIVM: sera from common CoV cases and non-CoV respiratory cases were partially obtained from a previous study at the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (METC Noord-Holland, http://www.trialregister.nl; NTR3386 and 481810 and partially from anonymized leftover serum from routine diagnostics for respiratory pathogens or SARS-CoV-2. The current study was performed in accordance with the guidelines for sharing of patient data of observational scientific research in emergency situations as issued by the Commission on Codes of Conduct of the Federation of Dutch Medical Scientific Societies (https://www.federa.org/federa-english). University of Geneva/HUG: Anonymized leftovers of serum and plasma samples were used for this analysis. Ethical approval for all samples used in this study was waived by the local ethics committee of the HUG that approves usage of leftover of patient samples collected for diagnostic purposes in accordance with our institutional and national regulations. All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data will be made available upon reasonable request.