RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The Accuracy of Healthcare Worker versus Self Collected (2-in-1) Oropharyngeal and Bilateral Mid-Turbinate (OPMT) Swabs and Saliva Samples for SARS-CoV-2
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.09.17.20197004
DO 10.1101/2020.09.17.20197004
A1 Tan, Seow Yen
A1 Tey, Hong Liang
A1 Lim, Ernest Tian Hong
A1 Toh, Song Tar
A1 Chan, Yiong Huak
A1 Tan, Pei Ting
A1 Lee, Sing Ai
A1 Tan, Cheryl Xiaotong
A1 Koh, Gerald Choon Huat
A1 Tan, Thean Yen
A1 Siau, Chuin
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/18/2020.09.17.20197004.abstract
AB Background Self-sampling for SARS-CoV-2 would significantly raise testing capacity and reduce healthcare worker (HCW) exposure to infectious droplets personal, and protective equipment (PPE) use.Methods We conducted a diagnostic accuracy study where subjects with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 (n=401) and healthy volunteers (n=100) were asked to self-swab from their oropharynx and mid-turbinate (OPMT), and self-collect saliva. The results of these samples were compared to an OPMT performed by a HCW in the same patient at the same session.Results In subjects confirmed to have COVID-19, the detection rates of the HCW-swab, self-swab, saliva, and combined self-swab plus saliva samples were 82.8%, 75.1%, 74.3% and 86.5% respectively. All samples obtained from healthy volunteers were tested negative. Compared to HCW-swab, the detection rates of a self-swab sample and saliva sample were inferior by 8.7% (95%CI: 2.4% to 15.0%, p=0.006) and 9.5% (95%CI: 3.1% to 15.8%, p=0.003) respectively. The combined detection rate of self-swab and saliva had a higher detection rate of 2.7% (95%CI: −2.6% to 8.0%, p=0.321). The sensitivity of both the self-collection methods are higher when the Ct value of the HCW swab is less than 30. The negative correctness of both the self-swab and saliva testing was 100% (95% CI 96.4% to 100%).Conclusion Our study provides evidence that detection rates of self-collected OPMT swab and saliva samples were inferior to a HCW swab, but they could still be useful testing tools in the appropriate clinical settings.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study is supported by Sheares Healthcare Group Pte Ltd. The study sponsor had no role in the design, implementation, analysis or write‐up of the studyAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board (CIRB Ref: 2020/2460)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll relevant information are available in the manuscript