PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Edwards, Thomas
AU  - Santos, Victor S.
AU  - Wilson, Anne L.
AU  - Cubas-Atienzar, Ana I.
AU  - Kontogianni, Konstantina
AU  - Williams, Christopher T.
AU  - Adams, Emily R.
AU  - Cuevas, Luis E.
TI  - Variation of SARS-CoV-2 viral loads by sample type, disease severity and time: a systematic review
AID  - 10.1101/2020.09.16.20195982
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.09.16.20195982
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/18/2020.09.16.20195982.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/18/2020.09.16.20195982.full
AB  - Background To describe whether SARS-CoV-2 viral loads (VLs) and cycle thresholds (CTs) vary by sample type, disease severity and symptoms duration.Methods Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, BioRxiv and MedRxiv. Studies reporting individual SARS-CoV-2 VLs and/or CT values from biological samples. Paired reviewers independently screened potentially eligible articles. CT values and VLs distributions were described by sample type, disease severity and time from symptom onset. Differences between groups were examined using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn ‘s tests (post-hoc test). The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tools.Results 14 studies reported CT values, 8 VLs and 2 CTs and VLs, resulting in 432 VL and 873 CT data points. VLs were higher in saliva and sputum (medians 4.7×108 and 6.5×104 genomes per ml, respectively) than in nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs (medians 1.7×102 and 4.8×103). Combined naso/oropharyngeal swabs had lower CT values (i.e. higher VLs) than single site samples (p=<0.0001). CT values were also lower in asymptomatic individuals and patients with severe COVID-19 (median CT 30 for both) than among patients with moderate and mild symptoms (31.4 and 31.3, respectively). Stool samples were reported positive for a longer period than other specimens.Conclusion VLs are higher in saliva and sputum and in individuals who are asymptomatic of with severe COVID-19. Diagnostic testing strategies should consider that VLs vary by sample type, disease severity and time since symptoms onset.Summary This systematic review found a higher viral load in saliva and sputum than in nasopharyngeal swabs, in asymptomatic individuals and patients with severe COVID-19. Diagnostic testing strategies should consider the type of sample, disease severity and the time since symptoms onset.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding Statement: LEC and ERA are funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, the Centre of Excellence in Infectious Diseases Research (Liverpool) and the Alder Hey Charity; and Wellcome/DFID through a grant for the development of COVID-19 diagnostics (grant number 220764/Z/20/Z). ALW receives support from the Partnership for Increasing the Impact of Vector Control (PIIVeC), funded by the UK Medical Research Council (grant number MR/P027873/1) through the UK Global Challenges Research Fund.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This was a systematic review of published data, and therefore ethical approval was not requiredAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available from the corresponding author by request