PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Finucane, Anne M.
AU  - O’Donnell, Hannah
AU  - Lugton, Jean
AU  - Swenson, Connie
AU  - Pagliari, Claudia
TI  - Digital Health Interventions in Palliative Care: A Systematic Meta-Review and Evidence Synthesis
AID  - 10.1101/2020.09.16.20195834
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.09.16.20195834
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/18/2020.09.16.20195834.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/18/2020.09.16.20195834.full
AB  - Digital health interventions (DHIs) have the potential to improve the accessibility and effectiveness of palliative care but heterogeneity amongst existing systematic reviews presents a challenge for evidence synthesis. This rigorous meta-review applied a structured search of 10 databases from 2006 to 2020, revealing 21 relevant systematic reviews, encompassing 332 unique publications. Most reviews were moderate quality. Interventions delivered via videoconferencing (17%), electronic healthcare records (16%) and phone (13%) were most frequently described. DHIs were typically used in palliative care for education (20%), symptom management (15%), decision-making support (13%), information provision or management (13%), and communication (9%). Positive impacts were reported on education, decision-making, information-sharing, communication, and costs. Impacts on symptom management were either positive or showed no harmful effects. However often DHIs were described but not evaluated. Responsive pragmatic research designs are now needed to guide further evaluation, implementation and to inform future service innovation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) disclosed that no financial support was provided for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The posts of Anne Finucane and Connie Swenson were funded by Marie CurieAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This was a metareview study, ethical approval was not required.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is available on request from the corresponding author.