PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Haq, Kazi T. AU - Rogovoy, Nichole M. AU - Thomas, Jason A. AU - Hamilton, Christopher AU - Lutz, Katherine J. AU - Wirth, Ashley AU - Bender, Aron B. AU - German, David M. AU - Przybylowicz, Ryle AU - van Dam, Peter AU - Dewland, Thomas A. AU - Dalouk, Khidir AU - Stecker, Eric AU - Nazer, Babak AU - Jessel, Peter M. AU - MacMurdy, Karen S. AU - Zarraga, Ignatius Gerardo E. AU - Beitinjaneh, Bassel AU - Henrikson, Charles A. AU - Raitt, Merritt AU - Fuss, Cristina AU - Ferencik, Maros AU - Tereshchenko, Larisa G. TI - Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Effect on Electrical Dyssynchrony (aCRT-ELSYNC): a randomized controlled trial AID - 10.1101/2020.09.14.20194415 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.09.14.20194415 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/15/2020.09.14.20194415.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/15/2020.09.14.20194415.full AB - Introduction Adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) is known to have clinical benefits over conventional CRT; however, their effects on the electrical dyssynchrony have not been compared.Methods We conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in patients receiving CRT for routine clinical indications. Participants underwent cardiac computed tomography and 128-electrodes body surface mapping. We measured electrical dyssynchrony on the epicardial surface using noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) before and 6 months post-CRT. Ventricular electrical uncoupling (VEU) was calculated as the difference between the mean left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) activation times. An electrical dyssynchrony index (EDI) was computed as the standard deviation of local epicardial activation times.Results We randomized 27 participants (mean age 64±12 y; 34% female; 53% ischemic cardiomyopathy; LV ejection fraction 28±8%; QRS duration 155±21 ms; strict left bundle branch block (LBBB) in 13%). In atypical LBBB (n=11;41%) with S-waves in V5-V6, conduction block occurred in the anterior RV, as opposed to the interventricular groove in those who met the strict LBBB criteria. As compared to baseline, VEU reduced post-CRT in aCRT (median reduction 18.9(interquartile range 4.3-29.2 ms; P=0.034), but not in conventional CRT (21.4(−30.0 to 49.9 ms; P=0.525) group. There were no differences in the degree of change in VEU and EDI indices between treatment groups.Conclusion The effect of aCRT and conventional CRT on electrical dyssynchrony is largely similar. Further studies are needed to investigate if atypical LBBB with prominent S wave in V5-V6 responds to His bundle pacing.Competing Interest StatementThe study was funded by Medtronic, Inc, as a physician-initiated study (LGT).Clinical TrialClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02543281Funding StatementThe study was funded by Medtronic, Inc, as a physician-initiated study (LGT).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) Institutional Review Board (IRB), and it was monitored by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. All study participants signed written informed consent before entering the study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData can be made available to other investigators after confirmation of appropriate IRB oversight of the proposed additional analyses.