PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Goldfarb, David M. AU - Tilley, Peter AU - Al-Rawahi, Ghada N. AU - Srigley, Jocelyn A. AU - Ford, Geoffrey AU - Pedersen, Heather AU - Pabbi, Abhilasha AU - Hannam-Clark, Stephanie AU - Charles, Marthe AU - Dittrick, Michelle AU - Gadkar, Vijay J. AU - Pernica, Jeffrey M. AU - Hoang, Linda M. N. TI - Self-collected Saline Gargle Samples as an Alternative to Healthcare Worker Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Outpatients AID - 10.1101/2020.09.13.20188334 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.09.13.20188334 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/14/2020.09.13.20188334.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/14/2020.09.13.20188334.full AB - Background We assessed the performance, stability, and user acceptability of swab-independent self-collected saliva and saline mouth rinse/gargle sample types for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 in adults and school-aged children.Methods Outpatients who had recently been diagnosed with COVID-19 or were presenting with suspected COVID-19 were asked to have a nasopharyngeal swab collected and provide at least one self-collected sample type. A portion of participants were also asked about sample acceptability. Samples underwent molecular testing using multiple assays. Saline mouth rinse/gargle and saliva samples were tested daily at time zero, day one, and day 2 to assess nucleic acid stability at room temperature.Results 50 participants (aged 4 to 71 years) were included; of these, 40 had at least one positive sample and were included in the primary sample yield analysis. Saline mouth rinse/gargle samples had a sensitivity of 98% (39/40) while saliva samples had a sensitivity of 79% (26/33). Both saline mouth rinse/gargle and saliva samples showed stable viral RNA detection after 2 days of room temperature storage. Mouth rinse/gargle samples had the highest (mean 4.9) and HCW-collected NP swabs had the lowest acceptability scores (mean 3.1).Conclusion Saline mouth rinse/gargle samples demonstrated the highest combined user acceptability ratings and analytical performance when compared with saliva and HCW collected NP swabs. This sample type is a promising swab-independent option, particularly for outpatient self-collection in adults and school aged children.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This project was reviewed by the BC Children and Womens Research Ethics Board and deemed a quality improvement/quality assurance (QI/QA) activity based on completion of the Provincial Health Services Authority Project Sorting Tool.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials.