PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Magnusson, Karin AU - Helgeland, Jon AU - Grøsland, Mari AU - Telle, Kjetil TI - The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on emergency and elective hip surgeries in Norway AID - 10.1101/2020.09.11.20191734 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.09.11.20191734 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/11/2020.09.11.20191734.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/11/2020.09.11.20191734.full AB - Objective To assess the effects of Covid-19 pandemic lockdown restrictions on the number of emergency and elective hip joint surgeries, and explore whether these procedures are more/less affected by lockdown restrictions than other hospital care.Methods In 1.344.355 persons aged ≥35 years in the Norwegian emergency preparedness (BEREDT C19) register, we studied the daily number of persons having 1) emergency surgeries due to hip fractures, and 2) electively planned surgeries due to hip osteoarthritis before and after Covid-19 lockdown restrictions were implemented nationally on March 13th 2020, for different age and sex groups. Incidence Rate Ratios [IRR] reflect the after-lockdown number of surgeries divided by the before-lockdown number of surgeries.Results After-lockdown elective hip surgeries were one third the number of before-lockdown (IRR ∼0.3), which is a greater drop than the drop seen in all-cause elective hospital care (IRR ∼0.6) (no age/sex differences). Men aged 35-69 had half the number of emergency hip fracture surgeries (IRR ∼0.6), whereas women aged ≥70 had the same number of emergency hip fracture surgeries after lockdown (IRR ∼1). Only women aged 35–69 and men aged ≥70 had emergency hip fracture surgery rates after lockdown comparable to what may be expected based on analyses of all-cause acute care (IRR ∼0.80)Conclusion Important to note for future pandemics management is that lockdown restrictions may impact more on scheduled joint surgery than other scheduled hospital care. Lockdown may also impact on the number of emergency joint surgeries for men aged ≥35 but not for women aged ≥70.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding/support The study was funded by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. No external funding was received. Role of the funder The funding sources had no influence on the design or conduct of the study, the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data, the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The BEREDT C19 register is authorized by Norwegian law and no external ethical board review was required.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are not available for public use.