RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evaluation of recombinant nucleocapsid and spike proteins for serological diagnosis of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.03.17.20036954
DO 10.1101/2020.03.17.20036954
A1 Zhang, Pingping
A1 Gao, Qi
A1 Wang, Tang
A1 Ke, Yuehua
A1 Mo, Fei
A1 Jia, Ruizhong
A1 Liu, Wanbing
A1 Liu, Lei
A1 Zheng, Shangen
A1 Liu, Yuzhen
A1 Li, Luping
A1 Wang, Yao
A1 Xu, Lei
A1 Hao, Kun
A1 Yang, Ruifu
A1 Li, Shiyue
A1 Lin, Changqing
A1 Zhao, Yong
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/01/2020.03.17.20036954.abstract
AB Background The colloidal gold immunochromatography assay (GICA) is a rapid diagnostic tool for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections. However, with significant numbers of false negatives, improvements to GICA are needed.Methods Six recombinant HCoV-19 nucleocapsid and spike proteins were prepared and evaluated. The optimal proteins were employed to develop a sandwich-format GICA strip to detect total antibodies (IgM and IgG) against HCoV-19. GICA’s performance was assessed with comparison of viral RNA detection.Results Recombinant HCoV-19 proteins were obtained, including three prokaryotically expressed rN, rN1, rN2 nucleocapsid proteins, and three eukaryotically expressed rS1, rS-RBD, rS-RBD-mFc spike proteins. The recombinant proteins with the highest ELISA titers (rS1 and rS-RBD-mFc) against coronavirus-specific IgM and IgG were chosen for GICA development. The GICA has a sensitivity and specificity of 86.89% (106/122) and 99.39% (656/660), respectively. Furthermore, 65.63% (21/32) of the clinically confirmed but RT-PCR negative samples were GICA positive.Conclusions The eukaryotically-expressed spike proteins (rS1and rS-RBD-mFc) are more suitable than the prokaryotically expressed nucleocapsid proteins for HCoV-19 serological diagnosis. The GICA sandwich used to detect total antibodies is a powerful complement to the current standard RNA-based tests.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding for this study was provided by The National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC1200502), and The National Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 2018ZX10101003-002). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.