PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Edward E. Walsh AU - Robert Frenck AU - Ann R. Falsey AU - Nicholas Kitchin AU - Judith Absalon AU - Alejandra Gurtman AU - Stephen Lockhart AU - Kathleen Neuzil AU - Mark J. Mulligan AU - Ruth Bailey AU - Kena A. Swanson AU - Ping Li AU - Kenneth Koury AU - Warren Kalina AU - David Cooper AU - Camila Fontes-Garfias AU - Pei-Yong Shi AU - Özlem Türeci AU - Kristin R. Tompkins AU - Kirsten E. Lyke AU - Vanessa Raabe AU - Philip R. Dormitzer AU - Kathrin U. Jansen AU - Uğur Şahin AU - William C. Gruber TI - RNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccine BNT162b2 Selected for a Pivotal Efficacy Study AID - 10.1101/2020.08.17.20176651 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.08.17.20176651 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/28/2020.08.17.20176651.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/28/2020.08.17.20176651.full AB - Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections and the resulting disease, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), have spread to millions of people globally. Multiple vaccine candidates are under development, but no vaccine is currently available.Methods Healthy adults 18–55 and 65–85 years of age were randomized in an ongoing, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded dose-escalation study to receive 2 doses at 21-day intervals of placebo or either of 2 lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine candidates: BNT162b1, which encodes a secreted trimerized SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain, or BNT162b2, which encodes a prefusion stabilized membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike. In each of 13 groups of 15 participants, 12 received vaccine and 3 received placebo. Groups were distinguished by vaccine candidate, age of participant, and vaccine dose level. Interim safety and immunogenicity data of BNT162b1 in younger adults have been reported previously from US and German trials. We now present additional safety and immunogenicity data from the US Phase 1 trial that supported selection of the vaccine candidate advanced to a pivotal Phase 2/3 safety and efficacy evaluation.Results In both younger and older adults, the 2 vaccine candidates elicited similar dose- dependent SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing geometric mean titers (GMTs), comparable to or higher than the GMT of a panel of SARS-CoV-2 convalescent sera. BNT162b2 was associated with less systemic reactogenicity, particularly in older adults.Conclusion These results support selection of the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate for Phase 2/3 large-scale safety and efficacy evaluation, currently underway.Competing Interest StatementCompeting interests: NK, JA, AG, SL, RB, KAS, PL, KK, WK, DC, KRT, PRD, WCG, and KUJ are employees of Pfizer and may hold stock options. US and OT are stock owners, management board members, and employees at BioNTech SE (Mainz, Germany) and are inventors on patents and patent applications related to RNA technology. MJM, KEL, KN, EEW, ARF, RF, and VR received compensation from Pfizer for their role as study investigators. CFG and PYS received compensation from Pfizer to perform the neutralization assay.Clinical TrialNCT04368728Funding StatementBioNTech is the sponsor of the study. Pfizer was responsible for the design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and writing of the report. The corresponding authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit the data for publication. All study data were available to all authors.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the institutional review boards for each participating site prior to enrollment of any study participant in this studyAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesUpon request, and subject to review, Pfizer will provide the data that support the findings of this study. Subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions, Pfizer may also provide access to the related individual anonymized participant data. https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical-trials/trial-data-and-results