PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Binol, Hamidullah AU - Niazi, M. Khalid Khan AU - Essig, Garth AU - Shah, Jay AU - Mattingly, Jameson K. AU - Harris, Michael S. AU - Elmaraghy, Charles AU - Teknos, Theodoros AU - Taj-Schaal, Nazhat AU - Yu, Lianbo AU - Gurcan, Metin N. AU - Moberly, Aaron C. TI - Digital otoscopy videos versus composite images: A reader study to compare the accuracy of ENT physicians AID - 10.1101/2020.08.17.20176131 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.08.17.20176131 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/21/2020.08.17.20176131.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/21/2020.08.17.20176131.full AB - Objectives With the increasing emphasis on developing effective telemedicine approaches in Otolaryngology, this study explored whether a single composite image stitched from a digital otoscopy video provides acceptable diagnostic information to make an accurate diagnosis, as compared with that provided by the full video.Methods Five Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) physicians reviewed the same set of 78 digital otoscope eardrum videos from four eardrum conditions: normal, effusion, retraction, and tympanosclerosis, along with the composite images generated by a SelectStitch method that selectively uses video frames with computer-assisted selection, as well as a Stitch method that incorporates all the video frames. Participants provided a diagnosis for each item along with a rating of diagnostic confidence. Diagnostic accuracy for each pathology of SelectStitch was compared with accuracy when reviewing the entire video clip and when reviewing the Stitch image.Results There were no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy for physicians reviewing SelectStitch images and full video clips, but both provided better diagnostic accuracy than Stitch images. The inter-reader agreement was moderate.Conclusion Equal to using full video clips, composite images of eardrums generated by SelectStitch provided sufficient information for ENTs to make the correct diagnoses for most pathologies. These findings suggest that use of a composite eardrum image may be sufficient for telemedicine approaches to ear diagnosis, eliminating the need for storage and transmission of large video files, along with future applications for improved documentation in electronic medical record systems, patient/family counseling, and clinical training.Level of Evidence Level 3Competing Interest StatementAuthors ACM, GE, and CE are shareholders in Otologic Technologies. Authors ACM and MNG are paid consultants and serve on the Board of Directors for Otologic Technologies.Clinical TrialNo clinical trials and interventional study.Funding StatementThe project described was supported in part by Award R21 DC016972 (PIs: Gurcan, Moberly) from National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders or the National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the Ohio State University (OSU) prior to beginning the study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, HB, upon reasonable request.