RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Salivary anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA as an accessible biomarker of mucosal immunity against COVID-19
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.08.07.20170258
DO 10.1101/2020.08.07.20170258
A1 Varadhachary, Atul
A1 Chatterjee, Dev
A1 Garza, Javier
A1 Garr, R. Patrick
A1 Foley, Christopher
A1 Letkeman, Andrea
A1 Dean, John
A1 Haug, David
A1 Breeze, Juliet
A1 Traylor, Robbyn
A1 Malek, Andrew
A1 Nath, Rohan
A1 Linbeck, Leo
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/11/2020.08.07.20170258.abstract
AB Background Mucosal immunity, including secretory IgA (sIgA), plays an important role in early defenses against respiratory pathogens. Salivary testing, the most convenient way to measure sIgA, has been used to characterize mucosal immune responses to many viral infections including SARS, MERS, influenza, HIV, and RSV. However, its role has not yet been characterized in the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we report development and validation of a rapid immunoassay for measuring salivary IgA against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and report quantitative results in both pre-COVID-19 and muco-converted subjects.Methods We developed and refined a specific test for salivary IgA against SARS-CoV-2 on the Brevitest platform, a rapid immunoassay system designed for point-of-care use. A qualitative test was validated as per FDA guidelines with saliva obtained from subjects prior to the emergence of COVID-19, and from PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients. We also generated a quantitative measure of anti-SARS-CoV-2 salivary IgA. Time taken for saliva self-collection was measured and its ease-of-use assessed.Results We successfully validated a qualitative salivary assay for SARS-CoV-2 IgA antibodies, with positive and negative predictive values of 92% and 97%, respectively, and no observable cross-reactivity with any of seven potential confounders. Pre-COVID-19 saliva samples showed an 8-fold range of IgA concentrations, suggesting a broad continuum of natural antibody resistance against the novel virus, though at levels lower than that observed in COVID-19 PCR-confirmed subjects. Samples from muco-positive subjects also shown a ~9-fold variation in salivary IgA levels, with elevated salivary IgA observed beyond three months after onset of symptoms. We observed a correlation (r=0.4405) between salivary IgA levels and COVID-19 disease severity. In anecdotal observations, we observed individuals who exhibited antibodies early in the course of their disease, contemporaneously with a positive PCR test, as well as individuals who muco-converted despite no known direct exposure to a COVID-19 patient, no symptoms, and negative molecular and/or serum antibody tests. Salivary collection took 5-10 minutes, and was reported as being easy (mean of 1.1 on a scale of 1 to 10).Implications Mucosal immunity, including secretory IgA, plays an important role in host defense against respiratory pathogens, and our early data suggest it may do so in COVID-19. Salivary IgA, an accessible marker of mucosal immunity, may be a useful indicator of several key parameters including individual and community immune response, disease severity, clinical risk, and herd immunity. The non-invasive nature and ease of saliva collection facilitates its potential use as a biomarker for ongoing patient assessment and management, as well as a community surveillance tool. By measuring mucosal immune responses directly and systemic immune responses indirectly, salivary IgA could be useful in developing and deploying a vaccine(s) against COVID-19. Quantitative IgA assessment could also potentially serve as a tool to segment the population into different risk categories and inform individual and collective decisions relating to appropriate activities and vaccine prioritization/delivery. These data reinforce the importance of further investigation into the role of mucosal immunity and IgA in host responses against COVID-19.Competing Interest StatementAV, DC, JG, PG, AL, CF, LL are employees of BreviTest Technologies LLC., and Fannin Innovation Studio. JD is an intern at BreviTest Technologies, LLC. Clinical TrialClinical trial protocol was used for sample collection. No subjects were treated.Funding StatementDevelopment of the Brevitest platform was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Grant Numbers: 1 R43 DA041966-01; 1 R43 MD013409-01A1; 1 R43 DA043325-01, 2 R44 DA043325-02, 5 R44 DA043325-03; 3 R43 DA041966-01S1, the Vijay and Marie Goradia Foundation, and Fannin Innovation Studio.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The protocol and informed consent form for collection of saliva samples for this Minimal Risk Study received expedited approval by IntegReview IRB, Austin, TX.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesIndividual subject-level data included in the manuscript.