PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - McLaughlin, Kevin AU - Bettencourt, Amie AU - Young, Daniel AU - Hoyer, Erik AU - Friedman, Michael AU - Colantuoni, Elizabeth AU - Goeddel, Lee A. AU - Gozalo, Pedro TI - Using Latent Class Analysis to Identify Subgroups of Post-Operative Older Adults AID - 10.1101/2025.01.03.25319954 DP - 2025 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2025.01.03.25319954 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2025/01/05/2025.01.03.25319954.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2025/01/05/2025.01.03.25319954.full AB - Objective Identify subgroups of postoperative older adults using electronic health record data.Summary of Background Data Postoperative older adults represent a vulnerable population who may benefit from tailored postoperative care pathways. Identifying clinical subgroups can inform the development of these pathways.Methods Retrospective cohort study of postoperative adults >65 years (N=2,036) from a single healthcare system. Latent class analysis was used to identify patient subgroups based on measures of frailty, mobility, activities of daily living, and general health status. Hospital outcomes were described among each subgroup, including extended lengths of stay (LOS) (>0.5 SD beyond mean LOS by surgical category), discharge disposition (i.e., home versus non-home discharge), and utilization (weekly visit frequency) of physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT).Results We identified 3 subgroups that we labeled Low Frailty-High Mobility (LF-HM), High Frailty-Low Mobility (HF-LM), and Low Frailty-Low Mobility (LF-LM), representing 15.3%, 27.6%, and 57.1% of the cohort, respectively. Discharge to home was highest among the LF-HM group (99%), followed by LF-LM (96%), and HF-LM (77%). Extended LOS was most common among the HF-LM group (27%), followed by LF-LM (18%), and LF-HM (6%). PT and OT visit frequencies were highest in the HF-LM group followed by the LF-LM and LF-HM groups.Conclusions This study identified 3 subgroups of postoperative older adults using routinely collected patient data. These groups may help to identify patients with increased odds of non-home discharge, extended LOS, and higher utilization of PT and OT and may inform the development of tailored postoperative care pathways for older adults.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding for this study was provided by the Learning Health Systems Rehabilitation Research Network (LeaRRn) (NIH 5P2CHD101895-03)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB of Johns Hopkins Medicine waived ethical approval for this study.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors