RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Measurement lessons of a repeated cross-sectional household food insecurity survey during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.08.04.20167650
DO 10.1101/2020.08.04.20167650
A1 Gaitán-Rossi, P.
A1 Vilar-Compte, M.
A1 Teruel, G.
A1 Pérez-Escamilla, R.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/06/2020.08.04.20167650.abstract
AB Objective To validate the telephone modality of the Latin American and Caribbean Food Security Scale (ELCSA) included in three waves of a phone survey to estimate the monthly household food insecurity (HFI) prevalence during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico.Design We examined the reliability and internal validity of the ELCSA scale in three repeated waves of a cross-sectional surveys with Rasch models. We estimated the monthly prevalence of food insecurity in the general population and in households with and without children, and compared them with a national 2018 survey. We tested concurrent validity by testing associations of HFI with socioeconomic status and anxiety.Setting ENCOVID-19 is a monthly telephone cross-sectional survey collecting information on the well-being of Mexican households during the pandemic lockdown. Surveys used probabilistic samples and we used data from April (n=833), May (n=850), and June 2020 (n=1,674).Participants Mexicans 18 years or older who had a mobile telephone.Results ELCSA had adequate model fit and HFI was associated, within each wave, with more poverty and anxiety. The COVID-19 lockdown was associated with an important reduction in food security; decreasing stepwise from 38.9% in 2018 to 24.9% in June 2020 in households with children.Conclusions Telephone surveys are a feasible strategy to monitor food insecurity with ELCSACompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe ENCOVID19 has been funded by several institutions. The April wave was financed by Universidad Iberoamericana Mexico City. The May and June waves were financed by UNICEF and the Organizacion de Estados Iberoamericanos para la Educacion, la Ciencia y la Cultura (OEI) Mexico. Universidad Iberoamericana, UNICEF and OEI had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Universidad Iberoamericana Research Ethics Committee (registry CONBIOETICA 09 CEI 008 2016060). Verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available for April in ZENODO as: Encuesta Nacional sobre los Efectos del COVID-19 en el Bienestar de los Hogares Mexicanos (ENCOVID-19-ABRIL). In a few weeks the other datasets will be released. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3950528