RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Colchicine for Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.12.19.24319310
DO 10.1101/2024.12.19.24319310
A1 Ballacci, Federico
A1 Giordano, Federica
A1 Conte, Cristina
A1 Telesca, Alessandro
A1 Collini, Valentino
A1 Imazio, Massimo
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/12/22/2024.12.19.24319310.abstract
AB Aims Inflammation is a main pathophysiological driver in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). Low-dose long-term colchicine for secondary prevention in patients with established ASCVD has been studied in multiple randomized trials in the last decade.This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term low-dose colchicine for secondary prevention in patients with established ASCVD.Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines to evaluate studies reporting long-term outcomes in patients with ASCVD. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases for relevant studies up to December 1, 2024. The primary outcome was the occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death (CVD), myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR).Results Ten randomized clinical trials enrolling 22532 patients were identified. Addition of colchicine to standard medical treatment in patients with established ASCVD reduced the risk for MACE by 27% (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 – 0.95), with a number needed to treat of 52. Colchicine was found to significantly reduce the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 - 0.96) and coronary revascularization (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65 - 0.94). There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, risk of serious gastrointestinal events, infections requiring hospitalization and cancer.Conclusions These findings support the use of long-term low-dose colchicine for secondary prevention of MACE in clinical practice.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study-level meta-analysis used data that is available from the included papers or from the relative supplemental material.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors