PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Mc Evoy, David
AU  - McAloon, Conor G.
AU  - Collins, Áine B.
AU  - Hunt, Kevin
AU  - Butler, Francis
AU  - Byrne, Andrew W.
AU  - Casey, Miriam
AU  - Barber, Ann
AU  - Griffin, John
AU  - Lane, Elizabeth Ann
AU  - Wall, Patrick
AU  - More, Simon J.
TI  - The relative infectiousness of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected persons compared with symptomatic individuals: A rapid scoping review
AID  - 10.1101/2020.07.30.20165084
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.07.30.20165084
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/01/2020.07.30.20165084.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/01/2020.07.30.20165084.full
AB  - Objectives The aim of this study was to conduct a scoping review of estimates of the relative infectiousness of asymptomatic persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 compared with symptomatic individuals.Design Rapid scoping review of literature available until 8th April 2020.Setting International studies on the infectiousness of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2Participants Studies were selected for inclusion if they defined asymptomatics as a separate cohort distinct from pre-symptomatics and if they provided a quantitative measure of the infectiousness of asymptomatics relative to symptomatics.Primary outcome measures The relative number of secondary cases produced by an average primary case, the relative probability of transmitting infection upon contact, and the degree of viral shedding.Results Very few studies reported estimates of relative infectiousness of asymptomatic compared with symptomatic individuals. Significant differences exist in the definition of infectiousness. Viral shedding studies in general show no difference in shedding levels between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals but are likely to be impacted by insufficient statistical power. Two contact tracing studies provided estimates of 0.7 and 1.0, but differences in approach and definition preclude comparison across the two studies. Finally, two modelling studies suggest a relative infectiousness of around 0.5 but one of these was more reflective of the infectiousness of undocumented rather than asymptomatic cases. Importantly, one contact tracing study showing a very low level of infectiousness of asymptomatic was not included in the analysis at this point due difficulties interpreting the reported findings.Conclusions The present study highlights the need for additional studies in this area as a matter of urgency. For the purpose of epidemiological modelling, we cautiously suggest that at present, asymptomatics could be considered to have a degree of infectiousness which is about 0.40-0.70 that of symptomatics. However, it must be stressed that this suggestion comes from a very low evidence base and that estimates exist that are close to zero and close to 1.Strengths and limitations of this study- Differences in the definition of infectiousness and a low number of studies estimating this parameter negate the potential to provide a pooled quantitative estimate or relative infectiousness.- The present study highlights the need for additional studies in this area as a matter of urgency.- Several of the studies reviewed are in pre-print stage and are not peer-reviewed.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNAFunding StatementNo fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThis was a review of pre print and peer reviewed material available for researchers onlinePCRPolymerase chain reactionRT PCRreverse transcription polymerase chain reactionRIRelative infectiousness of asymptomatic versus symptomatic infected persons with COVID-19