RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Distribution of Time Documented as Spent on Observation Unit Disposition Process
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.12.10.24317182
DO 10.1101/2024.12.10.24317182
A1 Edmond, Farrah
A1 Algarin Mojica, Nicole
A1 Horowitz, Samantha
A1 Ng, Htet
A1 Bacchus, Matthew
A1 Harharsh, Tarek
A1 Richman, Mark
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/12/13/2024.12.10.24317182.abstract
AB Introduction Emergency Department (ED) Observation Units (OUs) are increasingly-common. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) reimbursement policies incentivize documenting longer times spent on the disposition/discharge process (≥31 minutes). In addition, there is a well-recognized phenomenon of “terminal digit preference (ending times in 0 or 5). The Long Island Jewish Medical Center (LIJ) ED’s OU disposition process is performed by physician assistants (PAs). This study investigates the distribution of times documented by OU PAs as being spent on disposition and whether those times indicate terminal digit preference.Methods Documentation for discharge times of 102 patients dispositioned from the LIJ ED OU were captured, along with the PA involved. Students T-test was used to compare percentages. Statistical significance was set a priori at p <0.05.Results Seven PAs entered discharge times for 102 patients. No times were documented as <31 minutes. Time documented by PAs demonstrated significant clustering (ie, each PA was very consistent in the amount of time they documented). Nearly 50% of times were documented as “35 minutes.” Almost the entire remainder of times (46.1%) were documented as exactly 31 minutes or within 2 minutes of that (ie, 31, 32, or 33 minutes). Slightly over 50% of times documented ended in a “0” or a “5,” statistically-significantly greater than the expected 20% (p <0.0001).Discussion Documentation of most times being at or just slightly greater than 31 minutes suggests that documentation may reflect CMS’s reimbursement incentives. Over half of times documented ended in 0 or 5, indicating “terminal digit preference.” Further research is needed to confirm these findings and analyze the impact of CMS policy changes on in healthcare documentation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB of Northwell Health Institutional Review Board's (IRB's) Human Research Protection Program (HSRD24-0133), waived ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data is available upon request from the corresponding author, Dr. Richman. The data utilized for this research were provided by Dr. Richman, who works in the Emergency Department at LIJ, through his portal access.