RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Early Diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy in Preterm Infants with MRI, General Movements and Neurological Exam
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.12.10.24318810
DO 10.1101/2024.12.10.24318810
A1 Jain, Shipra
A1 Harpster, Karen
A1 Merhar, Stephanie
A1 Kline-Fath, Beth
A1 Altaye, Mekibib
A1 Illapani, Venkata Sita Priyanka
A1 Peyton, Colleen
A1 Parikh, Nehal A.
A1 Cincinnati Infant Neurodevelopment Early Prediction Study (CINEPS) Investigators
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/12/11/2024.12.10.24318810.abstract
AB Background The increasing clinical use of combining structural MRI (sMRI) with General Movements Assessment (GMA) or Hammersmith Infant Neurological Exam (HINE) before five months corrected age (CA) for early diagnosis of cerebral palsy (CP) lacks sufficient prognostic data for children with CP, especially those with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) I.Objective Evaluate the predictive value of sMRI, GMA, and HINE individually and in combination for early CP diagnosis and assess accuracy across varying GMFCS levels in a regional cohort of preterm infants.Methods We performed sMRI between 39-44 weeks postmenstrual age and GMA and HINE between 12-18 weeks CA in 395 preterm infants born at ≤32 weeks’ gestation across five NICUs in Greater Cincinnati. Brain abnormalities on sMRI included white matter injuries, cortical and deep gray matter lesions, or extensive cerebellar hemorrhage. Absent fidgety movements constituted abnormal GMA; abnormal HINEs were scores <56. The primary outcome was CP diagnosis at 22-26 months CA, classified by the GMFCS. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios for individual tests and combinations.Results Of 338 (86%) infants with complete follow-up, 48 (14.2%) showed sMRI abnormalities, 15 (4.6%) had abnormal GMA, and 69 (20.9%) had abnormal HINE. Thirty-nine children (11.5%) developed CP at age 2, of which 28 had GMFCS level I and 11 had GMFCS >II. The combination of sMRI and GMA achieved 100% specificity but only 22% sensitivity while the combination of abnormal sMRI and HINE demonstrated sensitivity of 32% and specificity of 98% for prediction of CP. Individual or combined tests showed far higher sensitivity (78-100%) for predicting CP in children with GMFCS levels II-V.Conclusions The combination of sMRI with GMA or HINE demonstrated high specificity but low sensitivity for early CP diagnosis in a regional cohort of preterm infants. This approach appears effective for early detection of CP levels II-V but not for level I cases, the most prevalent type, underscoring the need for continued developmental follow-up for all very preterm infants and need for more sensitive diagnostic tools for early detection of CP.Questions What is the individual and combined prognostic accuracy of sMRI, GMA, and HINE for early diagnosis of CP in preterm infants?Findings In our prospective, regional study of preterm infants born at ≤32 weeks’ gestation, we found that combining brain abnormalities on sMRI with abnormal GMA achieved 100% specificity but 22% sensitivity for diagnosing CP. Individual or combined tests showed far higher sensitivity (78-100%) for predicting CP in children with GMFCS levels II-V. Both individual and combined tests were poor predictors of GMFCS level I CP, the most common type.Meaning While sMRI combined with GMA or HINE is effective for diagnosing CP with GMFCS levels II-V, this approach falls short for children with GMFCS level I.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study is supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01-NS094200 and R01-NS096037 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and R01 EB029944-01 from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) to Dr. Nehal Parikh.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional Review Board at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio approved the study, and written parental/guardian consents were obtained from all study participants.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, nehal.parikh{at}cchmc.org.