RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among health care workers in a secondary teaching hospital in Spain
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.07.26.20162529
DO 10.1101/2020.07.26.20162529
A1 Fernandez, Javier Garralda
A1 Vilches, Ignacio Molero
A1 Rodríguez, Alfredo Bermejo
A1 Torres, Isabel Cano
A1 Colino Romay, Elda I.
A1 García Arata, Isabel
A1 Aroca, Jerónimo Jaqueti
A1 Lillo, Rosa
A1 Lacomba, Daniel Lopez
A1 Mazón, Luis
A1 Esteban, Laura Molina
A1 Morales García, Luis J
A1 Monzo, Laura Moratilla
A1 Nieto-Borrajo, Elva
A1 Delgado, Maria Pacheco
A1 Menchero, Santiago Prieto
A1 Hernández, Cristina Sánchez
A1 Testillano, Eva Sánchez
A1 García-Martínez, Jesús
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/29/2020.07.26.20162529.abstract
AB Background The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a huge challenge to healthcare systems and their personnel worldwide. The study of the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers, through prevalence studies, will let us know viral expansion, individuals at most risk and the most exposed areas. The aim of this study is to gauge the impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in our hospital workforce and identify groups and areas at increased risk.Methods and Findings This is a cross-sectional and longitudinal study carried out on healthcare workers based on molecular and serological diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of the 3013 HCW invited to participate, finally 2439 (80.9%) were recruited, including 674 (22.4%) who had previously consulted at the OHS for confirmed exposure and/or presenting symptoms suggestive of COVID-19. A total of 411 (16.9%) and 264 (10.8%) healthcare workers were SARS-CoV-2 IgG and rRT-PCR positive, respectively. The cumulative prevalence considering all studies (IgG positive HCW and/or rRT-PCR positive detection) has been 485 (19.9%). SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive patients in whom the virus was not detected were 221 (9.1%); up to 151 of them (68.3%) did not report any compatible symptoms nor consult at the OHS for this reason. Men became more infected than women (25% vs 18.5%, p=0.0009), including when data were also classified by age. COVID-19 cumulative prevalence among the HCW assigned to medical departments was higher (25.2%) than others, as well as among medical staff (25.4%) compared with other professional categories (p<0.01).Conclusions Global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HCW of our centre has been 19.9%. Doctors and medical services personnel have had the highest prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but many of them have not presented compatible symptoms. This emphasizes the performance of continuous surveillance methods of the most exposed health personnel and not only based on the appearance of symptoms.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study has not received any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study has been independently evaluated and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada (Internal Code 20/37).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data referred to in the manuscript are available and included in the manuscript.