RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Refugee Healthcare Resilience and Burdens: A 10-year Mixed-Methods Analysis of System Shocks in Canada
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.12.06.24318519
DO 10.1101/2024.12.06.24318519
A1 Norrie, Eric
A1 Holdbrook, Linda
A1 Grewal, Rabina
A1 Talavlikar, Rachel
A1 Essar, Mohammad Yasir
A1 Williamson, Tyler
A1 Coakley, Annalee
A1 McBrien, Kerry
A1 Fabreau, Gabriel E.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/12/08/2024.12.06.24318519.abstract
AB Background System shocks, including sudden policy changes, refugee surges and pandemics, strain healthcare systems. These shocks compound existing vulnerabilities in refugee healthcare, limiting ability to provide patient care, but can also catalyze resilient adaptations. Investigating how local refugee health systems respond to shocks is critical to understanding resilience.Methods We conducted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study (2011–2020) at a specialized refugee health centre in Alberta, Canada, investigating four health system shocks: IFHP Funding Cuts (2012), Syrian Surge (2015), Yazidi Resettlement (2017), and COVID-19 (2020). We analyzed patient sociodemographic characteristics, health center utilization, and healthcare provider supply, conducting interrupted time series analysis of mean monthly appointments (total, family physicians, specialists and multidisciplinary team) and rates of change. We adapted a Health System Resilience framework to thematically analyze interviews with centre leaders and integrated these findings with quantitative findings to assess resilience and operational burdens.Findings From 2011 to 2020, 10,661 refugees from 106 countries attended 107,642 appointments. Mean monthly appointments rose from 455 to 2,208 (3.9-fold, p<0.01). Monthly appointments increased between IFHP and Syrian periods (610.8 to 937.9, p<0.01), but not between Syrian Surge and Yazidi Resettlement (p=0.29). During COVID-19, mean appointments remained stable (1,412.4 to 1,414.0, p=0.11), but additional monthly appointments rose from 6.3 to 110.4 (17.5-fold, p<0.01). Over ten years, mean provider hours increased from 320 to 736 (2.3-fold), and from 59.5 to 871.4 (14.6-fold) for family physicians and multidisciplinary team members. Qualitative analysis revealed resilience capacities but highlighted costs such as burnout, vicarious trauma, and financial strain. Integration showed the centre developed resilience but experienced notable operational burden.Interpretation Over a decade, a specialized refugee health centre adapted to successive shocks, transforming into a beacon clinic. It demonstrated resilience through care expansion and innovation, but with notable costs, financially and to health worker wellbeing.Funding NoneCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University of Calgary′s Conjoined Health Research Ethics Board (CHREB [mdash] REB19[ndash]1029) approved the study and granted a waiver of consent for quantitative data. Informed verbal consent was obtained from all qualitative participants.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData Availability Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.