RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Mentoring Matters: Evaluating The Black Physicians of Canada Mentorship Program
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.12.07.24318652
DO 10.1101/2024.12.07.24318652
A1 Obetta, Chikaodili
A1 Menezes, Anjali
A1 Chandran, Nivetha
A1 Egbedeyi, Onaope
A1 Taghavi, Maryam
A1 Tunde-Byass, Modupe
A1 Yu, Catherine
A1 Kalocsai, Csilla
A1 Najeeb, Umberin
A1 Swaleh, Rukia
A1 Norris, Mireille
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/12/08/2024.12.07.24318652.abstract
AB Purpose Black individuals face significant barriers in medicine, contributing to their underrepresentation as physicians and emphasizing the need for systemic change. From admissions processes to program design, medical schools often uphold outdated racial practices that disadvantage Black learners. Increased representation in medical schools benefits learners and improves care for diverse patient populations. Mentorship has proven essential in fostering success in higher education and can mitigate barriers to career progression. However, many Black learners face barriers to accessing quality mentorship despite its proven benefits in fostering equitable opportunities and career progression. The Scarborough Charter outlined 58 Canadian institutions committed to advancing Black inclusion in higher education through mentorship and accountability measures. In alignment with this goal, the Black Physicians of Canada (BPC) launched a racially concordant mentorship program. This study aimed to explore participants’ experiences and provide recommendations for future program iterations.Methods This study employed a convergent triangulation mixed methods design. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. The Yukawa Mentorship Evaluation Tool was used to measure program effectiveness. Descriptive analyses were conducted by a member of the research team. Data was coded by two members of the research team and findings were audited for consistency.Results A total of 51 participants (27 mentors, 24 mentees) completed the survey, and 13 (7 mentors, 6 mentees) participated in semi-structured interviews. Five themes emerged: Mentorship Characteristics, Program Administration, Perceived Program Benefits, Barriers to Mentorship, and Recommendations for Improvement.Conclusion The BPC mentorship program represents a historic step toward addressing unmet needs of Black medical residents in Canada. Participants expressed high satisfaction and highlighted areas for improvement. Racially concordant mentorship was seen as particularly valuable in addressing unique challenges faced by Black learners. The findings from this study provide critical insights into best practices for future mentorship programs, advancing diversity and equity in medicine while supporting Black learners’ success.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All study procedures were approved by the Research Ethics Board at the University of Toronto.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Not ApplicableAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.