PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Rehman, Nadia
AU  - Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
AU  - Mertz, Dominik
AU  - Muraca, Giulia M.
AU - Ontario HIV Treatment Network Cohort Study
AU - Realize
AU  - Jones, Aaron
TI  - Association between virtual visits and health outcomes of people living with HIV: A cross-sectional study
AID  - 10.1101/2024.12.04.24318511
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.12.04.24318511
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/12/06/2024.12.04.24318511.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/12/06/2024.12.04.24318511.full
AB  - Background Virtual care has been integrated as a modality of care in Ontario, yet its effectiveness for people living with HIV remains largely unexplored.Objectives We aimed to determine the association of visit modality (virtual, in-person, or both) on adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART), viral load, and quality of life (QOL) in people living with HIV in Ontario, Canada.Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the 2022 Ontario HIV Treatment Network Cohort Study (OCS), collected during the COVID-19 pandemic when virtual visits were first introduced. Participants were grouped into three categories based on the mode of care: virtual, in-person, or a combination of both. Data were collected through self-reported questionnaires and medical records, with viral load data linked to Public Health Ontario Laboratories (PHOL). Logistic regression was used to examine the outcomes of optimal ART adherence and viral load suppression, and linear regression was used for quality of life (mental and physical) outcomes.Results In 2022, 1930 participants accessed HIV care in the OCS. Among them, 19.0% received virtual care, 45.6% received in-person care, and 34.3% received care through virtual and in-person modalities. The median age of the participants was 55 years (IQR: 45-62). In the multivariable logistic regression model, virtual care was associated with an increased likelihood of optimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.70) and an increased likelihood of achieving viral load suppression (AOR 1.67, 95% CI:1.03-2.63). Moreover, combined virtual and in-person care is associated with an improved mental quality of life compared to in-person care (Adjusted Mean difference (MD) - 0.960, 95% CI 0.052,1.869).Conclusion This study suggests virtual care is positively associated with adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and viral suppression within this context. However, future research is necessary to establish causality and to assess the long-term effects of virtual care.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The data for this study is taken from Ontario HIV Treatment Cohort study (OCS). So this work is exempt from ethics.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data is obtained from OHTN from the OCS study. It is unethical for the authors to share the data set publicly. However, the data request can be made directly with OHTN by submitting a Research Application Process (RAP).