RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Why (and how) COVID-19 could move us closer to the “health information for all” goal
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.07.23.20160481
DO 10.1101/2020.07.23.20160481
A1 Capocasa, Marco
A1 Anagnostou, Paolo
A1 Bisol, Giovanni Destro
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/27/2020.07.23.20160481.abstract
AB In this manuscript, we present an analysis of open access (OA) rates of papers concerning COVID-19 and other important human diseases, whose results helped develop an evidence-based scalable strategy aimed at increasing the full and timely access to medical literature. We show that COVID-19 papers are much more openly available (OA rate of 89.5%) than those concerning the four most recent viral outbreaks (Avian influenza, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Swine influenza; OA rates (from 26.2% to 51.3%) and the ten non COVID-19 disease categories responsible for the highest number of deaths worldwide (OA rates from 44.0% for “Maternal and neonatal disorders” to 58.9% for “Respiratory infections and tuberculosis”). This evidence confronts us with an inevitable question: how can we bridge the gap between OA rates for COVID-19 and other high-impact human diseases? Based on empirical data and projections, we show that it is possible to increase substantially immediate OA to publicly-funded research and complement more demanding initiatives for access to medical literature in developing countries working on the sharing of post-prints at individual, group and multi stakeholder partnership level. However, to make our plan effective in bringing us closer to the “health information for all” goal a more widespread culture of cooperation is fundamental. We argue that the lesson taught by COVID-19 is a unique opportunity to raise awareness among researchers and stakeholders about the importance of open science for human health and to demonstrate that a real change is now possible.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the University of Rome La Sapienza (Italy), through the project Setting up a network for Responsible Research and Innovation - RRI-Net (PI116154C845CA8D). Neither the authors nor their institutions at any time received payment or services from a third party for any aspect of the submitted work. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This is a study in the field of Medical Education which is not based on a clinical trial and does not involve data on human subjects.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll the data used in the study are supplied in the uploaded supplementary material.