RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Creating and validating a DNA methylation-based proxy for Interleukin-6
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.07.20.20156935
DO 10.1101/2020.07.20.20156935
A1 Stevenson, Anna J.
A1 Gadd, Danni A.
A1 Hillary, Robert F.
A1 McCartney, Daniel L.
A1 Campbell, Archie
A1 Walker, Rosie M.
A1 Evans, Kathryn L.
A1 Harris, Sarah E.
A1 Spires-Jones, Tara L
A1 MacRae, Allan F.
A1 Visscher, Peter M.
A1 McIntosh, Andrew M
A1 Deary, Ian J
A1 Marioni, Riccardo E
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/25/2020.07.20.20156935.abstract
AB Chronic inflammation is a pervasive feature of ageing and may be linked to age-related cognitive decline. However, population studies evaluating its relationship with cognitive functioning have produced heterogeneous results. A potential reason for this is the variability of inflammatory mediators which could lead to misclassifications of individuals’ persisting levels of inflammation. The epigenetic mechanism DNA methylation has shown utility in indexing environmental exposures and could potentially be leveraged to provide proxy signatures of chronic inflammation.We conducted an elastic net regression of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in a cohort of 895 older adults (mean age: 69 years) to develop a DNA methylation-based predictor. The predictor was tested in an independent cohort (n=7,028 [417 with measured IL-6], mean age: 51 years).We examined the association between the DNA methylation IL-6 score and serum IL-6, its association with age and established correlates of circulating IL-6, and with cognitive ability.A weighted score from 12 DNA methylation sites optimally predicted IL-6 (independent test set R2=5.1%). In the independent test cohort, both measured IL-6, and the DNA methylation proxy, increased as a function of age (serum IL-6: n=417, β=0.02, SE=0.004 p=1.3×10−7; DNAm IL-6 score: n=7,028, β=0.02, SE=0.0009, p<2 × 10−16). Serum IL-6 was not found to associate with cognitive ability (n=417, β=-0.06, SE=0.05, p=0.19); however, an inverse association was identified between the DNA methylation score and cognitive functioning (n=7,028, β=-0.14, SE=0.02, pFDR=1.5 × 10−14).These results suggest DNA methylation-based predictors can be used as proxies for inflammatory markers, potentially allowing for reliable insights into the relationship between chronic inflammation and pertinent health outcomes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors thank all LBC1936 study participants and research team members who have contributed, and continue to contribute, to ongoing studies. LBC1936 is supported by Age UK (Disconnected Mind program) and the Medical Research Council (MR/M01311/1). Methylation typing was supported by Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (Pilot Fund award), Age UK, The Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund, The University of Edinburgh, and The University of Queensland. The Olink Proteomics assays were supported by a National Institutes of Health (NIH) research grant R01AG054628. This work was in part conducted in the Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, which is supported by the Medical Research Council and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (MR/K026992/1) and which supports IJD. The authors thank all individuals and project team members who have contributed to both GS and to the 'STRADL: Stratifying Resilience and Depression Longitudinally' follow-up study. GS received core support from the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates (CZD/16/6) and the Scottish Funding Council (HR03006) and is currently supported by the Wellcome Trust (216767/Z/19/Z). Genotyping and DNA methylation profiling of the GS samples was carried out by the Genetics Core Laboratory at the Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, Edinburgh, Scotland and was funded by the Medical Research Council UK and the Wellcome Trust (Wellcome Trust Strategic Award "STratifying Resilience and Depression Longitudinally" ((STRADL) Reference 104036/Z/14/Z)). AJS, DAG and RFH are Translational Neuroscience PhD students funded by Wellcome (203771/Z/16/Z to AJS; 108890/Z/15/Z to DAG and RFH). REM and DLMCC are supported by an Alzheimer's Research UK major project grant (ARUK-PG2017B-10). TSJ is supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement No. 681181) and the UK Dementia Research Institute which receives its funding from DRI Ltd, funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Alzheimer's Society, and Alzheimer's Research UK. PMV is supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (1113400) and the Australian Research Council (FL180100072). Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical permission for the LBC1936 was obtained from the Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee for Scotland (MREC/01/0/56) and the Lothian Research Ethics Committee (LREC/2003/2/29). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All components of GS received ethical approval from the NHS Tayside Committee on Medical Research Ethics (REC Reference Number: 05/S1401/89). GS has also been granted Research Tissue Bank status by the Tayside Committee on Medical Research Ethics (REC Reference Number: 10/S1402/20), providing generic ethical approval for a wide range of uses within medical research.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesLBC data are available on request from the Lothian Birth Cohort Study, University of Edinburgh (Ian Deary, I.Deary{at}ed.ac.uk). LBC data are not publicly available due to them containing information that could compromise participant consent and confidentiality. According to the terms of consent for Generation Scotland participants, access to data must be reviewed by the Generation Scotland Access Committee. Applications should be made to access{at}generationscotland.org.