PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Moore, David R.
AU  - Lin, Li
AU  - Bhalerao, Ritu
AU  - Caldwell-Kurtzman, Jody
AU  - Hunter, Lisa L.
TI  - Multidisciplinary clinical assessment and interventions for childhood listening difficulty and auditory processing disorder: Relation between research findings and clinical practice
AID  - 10.1101/2024.06.12.24308837
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.06.12.24308837
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/30/2024.06.12.24308837.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/30/2024.06.12.24308837.full
AB  - Purpose Listening difficulty (LiD), often classified as auditory processing disorder (APD), has been studied in both research and clinic settings. The aim of this study was to examine the predictive relation between these two settings. In our “SICLiD” research study, children with normal audiometry, but caregiver-reported LiD, performed poorly on both listening and cognitive tests. Here we examined results of clinical assessments and interventions for these children in relation to research performance.Methods Study setting was a tertiary pediatric hospital. Electronic medical records were reviewed for 64 children aged 6-13 years recruited into a SICLiD LiD group based on a caregiver report (ECLiPS). The review focused on clinical assessments and interventions provided by Audiology, Occupational Therapy, Psychology (Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics), and Speech-Language Pathology services, prior to study participation. Descriptive statistics on clinical encounters, identified conditions, and interventions were compared with quantitative, standardized performance on research tests. Z-scores were compared for participants with and without each clinical condition using univariate and logistic prediction analyses.Results Overall, 24 clinical categories related to LiD, including APD, were identified. Common conditions were attention (32%), language (28%), hearing (18%), anxiety (16%), and autism spectrum (6%) disorders. Performance on research tests varied significantly between providers, conditions, and interventions. Quantitative research data combined with caregiver reports provided reliable predictions of all clinical conditions except APD. Individual test significant correlations were scarce, but included the SCAN composite score, which predicted clinical language and attention difficulties, but not APD diagnoses.Conclusions The variety of disciplines, assessments, conditions and interventions revealed here supports previous studies showing that LiD is a multifaceted problem of neurodevelopment. Comparisons between clinical- and research-based assessments suggest a path that prioritizes caregiver reports and selected psychometric tests for screening and diagnostic purposes.Competing Interest StatementDavid Moore is a paid consultant and stock holder of hearX GroupFunding StatementThis study was funded by NIH DC014078, NIHR (UK), and the Cincinnati Children's Research FoundationAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB of Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsAPDAuditory Processing DisorderAUROCArea under the receiver operating characteristicCCC-2Children’s Communication Checklist (2nd edition)CCC GCCChildren’s Communication Checklist – General Communication CompositeCCC SIDIChildren’s Communication Checklist – Social interaction difference indexCCHMCCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical CenterDLBergen Dichotic Listening TestDL l - 15DL laterality score with an ILD = −15 dBECLiPS EASECLiPS Environmental and Auditory Sensitivity subscaleECLiPSEveryday Children’s Listening and Processing ScaleECLiPS LLLECLiPS Literacy/Language/Laterality subscaleECLiPS MAECLiPS Memory and Attention subscaleECLiPS PSSECLiPS Pragmatic and Social Skills subscaleECLiPS SAPECLiPS Speech and Auditory Processing subscaleEMRElectronic medical recordILDInteraural level differenceLiDListening DifficultiesLiSN-SListening in Spatialized Noise – Sentences testLiSN HCLiSN-S High Cue subscaleLiSN LCLiSN-S Low Cue subscaleLiSN SALiSN-S Spatial Advantage subscaleLiSN TALiSN-S Talker Advantage subscaleNIHNational Institutes of Health Cognition ToolboxNIH CCCrystalized reasoning Composite score of NIH Cognition ToolboxNIH DCCSDirectional Change Card Sorting test of NIH Cognition ToolboxNIH ECCEarly Childhood Composite score of NIH Cognition ToolboxNIH FCFluid reasoning Composite score of NIH Cognition ToolboxNIH FTFlanker test of NIH Cognition ToolboxNIH LSList sorting test of NIH Cognition ToolboxNIH ORROral reading recognition test of NIH Cognition ToolboxNIH PCPattern comparison processing speed test of NIH Cognition ToolboxNIH PVPicture Vocabulary test of NIH Cognition ToolboxNIH TCTotal Composite score of NIH Cognition ToolboxOROdds ratioPETympanic pressure equalization tubesSCAN AFGSCAN Auditory Figure-Ground subscaleSCAN FWSCAN Filtered Words subscaleSCAN CSSCAN Competing Sentences subscaleSCAN CWDSCAN Competing Words subscaleSICLiDSensitive Indicators of Childhood Listening Difficulties (study)TDTypically DevelopingVIFVariance inflation factor