RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The effect of trauma quality improvement programme implementation on quality of life among trauma patients in urban India
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.09.28.24314529
DO 10.1101/2024.09.28.24314529
A1 Kapitan, Eelika
A1 Berg, Johanna
A1 David, Siddarth
A1 Mohan, L N
A1 Felländer-Tsai, Li
A1 Chatterjee, Shamita
A1 Ekelund, Ulf
A1 Roy, Nobhojit
A1 Petzhold, Max
A1 Von Schreeb, Johan
A1 Soni, Kapil Dev
A1 Rajan, Sendhil
A1 Khajanchi, Monty
A1 Gerdin Wärnberg, Martin
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/26/2024.09.28.24314529.abstract
AB Trauma accounts for around 4.4 million deaths annually and is among the leading causes of death, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries. Trauma quality improvement programmes may reduce adverse patient outcomes but lack robust evidence. This study assessed the effect of implementing a trauma quality improvement programme using audit filters on health-related quality of life in adult trauma patients in urban India.We conducted a controlled interrupted time series study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03235388) across four tertiary care university hospitals. Adult (≥18 years) trauma patients, who were alive at 90 days post-admission, were included. After a 14-month observation phase, two hospitals were randomized to the intervention arm and implemented the trauma quality improvement programme, while two control hospitals did not implement any interventions. The study spanned from 2017 to 2022.Health-related quality of life was assessed 90 days post-admission using the EuroQol 5-dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire. The main outcome was EQ-5D health status, scaled from 0 to 100, analyzed using a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach. Descriptive analysis was performed for the five individual EQ-5D dimensions.2307 participants were eligible for the analyses. The DiD analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in the EQ-5D health status score in the intervention arm (DiD estimate −4.07 [95% CI: −7.00; −1.15]). For the 819 patients with major trauma, there was a more pronounced, but statistically insignificant reduction (DiD estimate −4.86 [95% CI: −9.87; 0.15]). In the intervention arm, mobility, self-care, and pain/discomfort improved, while usual activities and anxiety/depression worsened.Implementing trauma quality improvement programmes using audit filters may reduce the average health-related quality of life of trauma patients if more severely injured patients survive, highlighting the importance of assessing quality of life after the implementation of such programmes and ensuring adequate rehabilitation resources to support long-term recovery.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT03235388Funding StatementThis work was funded by the Swedish Research Council (2016-02041).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Swedish Ethical Review Authority gave ethical approval for this work (2017/930-31/2). The local ethical review board of Maulana Azad Medical College (MAMC) gave ethical approval for this work (F.1/IEC/MAMC/(57/02/2017/No 113). The local ethical review board of Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital (IPGME&R/SSKM), Kolkata gave ethical approval for this work (IPGME&R/IEC/2017/396). The local ethical review board of JJ Hospital, Mumbai gave ethical approval for this work (No. IEC/Pharm/CT/111/A/2017). The local ethical review board of St Johns Medical College, Bangalore gave ethical approval for this work (Ref. no. 160/2017). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.