PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Fernández-Sánchez, Antonio AU - Ruiz-Hermosa, Abel AU - Redondo-Tébar, Andrés AU - Díez-Fernández, Ana AU - Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente AU - Visier-Alfonso, María Eugenia AU - Sánchez-López, Mairena TI - Relation between motor competence and academic achievement: the mediating role of fitness and cognition in boys and girls AID - 10.1101/2024.11.21.24317694 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.11.21.24317694 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/22/2024.11.21.24317694.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/11/22/2024.11.21.24317694.full AB - Introduction Good motor competence is linked to better academic achievement in schoolchildren, potentially mediated by fitness and cognition. However, the relative impact of these factors and whether they differ by sex remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to assess the mediating role of fitness components and executive function on this relationship, with a particular focus on sex differences.Methods This cross-sectional study included 562 schoolchildren (9-11 years, 293 girls) from Cuenca, Spain. We assessed gross motor competence (MABC-2 battery), fitness components (ALPHA battery), executive function (Toolbox battery), academic achievement (mean of language and mathematics grades), weight, height, and sociodemographic variables. Serial multiple mediation models between gross motor competence to AA through fitness and cognition were conducted using the Hayes’ PROCESS SPSS macro, both for the total sample and by sex.Results Both fitness and executive function partially mediated the relationship between gross motor competence and AA. In the total sample, the direct effect explained most of the total effect (51.22% to 72.68%), followed by the cognitive path (19.51% to 30.73%), fitness path (10.84% to 19.02%), and multiple path (4.43% to 9.27%). In boys, only the cognitive path mediated the relationship (56.35% to 68.91%), while in girls, the fitness path (for cardiorespiratory fitness and speed/agility, 19.08% and 20.27%), the cognitive path (limited to upper body strength, 14.92%), and the multiple path (for cardiorespiratory fitness, speed/agility, and lower body strength, 4.93%, 8.31% and 9.43%) were partial mediators.Conclusions Our results suggest that part of the effect found between gross motor competence and academic achievement in children occurs from improvements in fitness and executive function. These findings emphasize the need for motor competence programs that target both fitness (especially cardiorespiratory fitness and speed/agility) and executive function to boost academic achievement in children aged 9-11. Additionally, interventions should consider sex-specific differences.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialREG: 2016/PI021Clinical Protocols https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30817628/ Funding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:- The study protocol was approved by The Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the ‘Virgen de la Luz’ Hospital in Cuenca. - REG: 2016/PI021. - Written consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data underlying the results presented in the study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding authorMCmotor competenceGMCgross motor competenceEFexecutive functionCRcardiorespiratory fitnessS/Aspeed/agilityUBSupper body strengthLBSlower body strengthAAacademic achievementIEindirect effect.