PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Graham, Nancy R.
AU  - Whitaker, Annalis N.
AU  - Strother, Camilla A.
AU  - Miles, Ashley K.
AU  - Grier, Dore
AU  - McElvany, Benjamin D.
AU  - Bruce, Emily A.
AU  - Poynter, Matthew E.
AU  - Pierce, Kristen K.
AU  - Kirkpatrick, Beth D.
AU  - Stapleton, Renee D.
AU  - An, Gary
AU  - Botten, Jason W.
AU  - Crothers, Jessica W.
AU  - Diehl, Sean A.
TI  - Kinetics and Isotype Assessment of Antibodies Targeting the Spike Protein Receptor Binding Domain of SARS-CoV-2 In COVID-19 Patients as a function of Age and Biological Sex
AID  - 10.1101/2020.07.15.20154443
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.07.15.20154443
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/22/2020.07.15.20154443.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/22/2020.07.15.20154443.full
AB  - SARS-CoV-2 is the newly emerged virus responsible for the global COVID-19 pandemic. There is an incomplete understanding of the host humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 during acute infection. Host factors such as age and sex as well the kinetics and functionality of antibody responses are important factors to consider as vaccine development proceeds. The receptor-binding domain of the CoV spike (RBD-S) protein is important in host cell recognition and infection and antibodies targeting this domain are often neutralizing. In a cross-sectional study of anti-RBD-S antibodies in COVID-19 patients we found equivalent levels in male and female patients and no age-related deficiencies even out to 93 years of age. The anti-RBD-S response was evident as little as 6 days after onset of symptoms and for at least 5 weeks after symptom onset. Anti-RBD-S IgG, IgM, and IgA responses were simultaneously induced within 10 days after onset, but isotype-specific kinetics differed such that anti-RBD-S IgG was most sustained over a 5-week period. The kinetics and magnitude of neutralizing antibody formation strongly correlated with that seen for anti-RBD-S antibodies. Our results suggest age- and sex-related disparities in COVID-19 fatalities are not explained by anti-RBD-S responses. The multi-isotype anti-RBD-S response induced by live virus infection could serve as a potential marker by which to monitor vaccine-induced responses.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNeither authors nor the University of Vermont have received payment or services from a third party for any aspect of the submitted work (including but not limited to grants, data monitoring board, study design, manuscript preparation, statistical analysis, etc.) External funding was from NIH (P20GM125498, and U01AI141997). Internal funding from the University of Vermont was also used for this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Vermont Institutional Review Board approval was granted under registration STUDY00881.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data are presented in the manuscript.